Quantcast
Channel: EL DISPENSADOR
Viewing all 65649 articles
Browse latest View live

NASA Completes Study of Future ‘Ice Giant’ Mission Concepts | NASA

$
0
0
NASA Completes Study of Future ‘Ice Giant’ Mission Concepts | NASA



NASA Completes Study 

of Future ‘Ice Giant’ 

Mission Concepts

A NASA-led and NASA-sponsored study of potential future missions to the mysterious “ice giant” planets Uranus and Neptune has been released—the first in a series of mission studies NASA will conduct in support of the next Planetary Science Decadal Survey. The results of this and future studies will be used as the Decadal Survey deliberates on NASA’s planetary science priorities from 2022-2032. The study identifies the scientific questions an ice giant mission should address, and discusses various instruments, spacecraft, flight-paths and technologies that could be used. 
Uranus and Neptune
Left: Arriving at Uranus in 1986, Voyager 2 observed a bluish orb with subtle features. A haze layer hid most of the planet's cloud features from view. Right: This image of Neptune was produced from Voyager 2 and shows the Great Dark Spot and its companion bright smudge.
Credits: Left: NASA/JPL-Caltech - Right: NASA
"This study argues the importance of exploring at least one of these planets and its entire environment, which includes surprisingly dynamic icy moons, rings, and bizarre magnetic fields," said Mark Hofstadter of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, one of the two co-chairs of the science team that produced the report. The European Space Agency (ESA) also participated in the study.
To date, Uranus and Neptune have been visited briefly by one spacecraft, Voyager 2.  Voyager rapidly flew by Uranus in 1986 and Neptune in 1989, as part of its grand tour of discovery that previously took it by Jupiter and Saturn.
Said co-chair Amy Simon of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, "We do not know how these planets formed and why they and their moons look the way they do. There are fundamental clues as to how our solar system formed and evolved that can only be found by a detailed study of one, or preferably both, of these planets." 
A variety of potential mission concepts are discussed in the study, including orbiters, flybys, and probes that would dive into Uranus’ atmosphere to study its composition. A narrow-angle camera would send data back to Earth about the ice giants and their moons. Uranus has 27 known moons, while Neptune has 14.
Collectively, Uranus and Neptune are referred to as ice giant planets. In spite of that name, relatively little solid ice is thought to be in them today, but it is believed there is a massive liquid ocean beneath their clouds, which accounts for about two-thirds of their total mass. This makes them fundamentally different from the gas giant planets, Jupiter and Saturn (which are approximately 85 percent gas by mass), and terrestrial planets like Earth or Mars, which are basically 100 percent rock. It’s not clear how or where ice giant planets form, why their magnetic fields are strangely oriented, and what drives geologic activity on some of their moons. These mysteries make them scientifically important, and this importance is enhanced by the discovery that many planets around other stars appear to be similar to our own ice giants. 
 
compositional differences among the giant planets and their relative sizes
Illustration of compositional differences among the giant planets and their relative sizes. Earth is shown for comparison. Jupiter and Saturn are primarily made of hydrogen and helium, the terrestrial planets are almost pure rock, while Uranus and Neptune are thought to be largely supercritical liquid water.
Credits: JPL/Caltech, based on material from the Lunar and Planetary Institute
It is now up to the next decadal survey to recommend science priorities for NASA for the next decade. NASA will then determine if and when to fly a mission that is responsive to those priorities.
The full study (529 pages), as well as a short summary are available at:
Last Updated: Aug. 6, 2017
Editor: Tricia Talbert

Hubble Spots Auroras on Uranus | NASA

$
0
0
Hubble Spots Auroras on Uranus | NASA



Hubble Spots Auroras 

on Uranus

double image of blue planet
#SpotHubble graphic
Got a stellar Hubble image on a T-shirt? Or maybe you’ve spotted a Hubble tattoo! Share your photos on Instagram, Twitter, Flickr and Facebook with #SpotHubble and maybe you’ll get a shout-out from @NASAHubble!
Credits: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center/Jenny Hottle
This is a composite image of Uranus by Voyager 2 and two different observations made by Hubble — one for the ring and one for the auroras.
Ever since Voyager 2 beamed home spectacular images of the planets in the 1980s, planet-lovers have been hooked on auroras on other planets. Auroras are caused by streams of charged particles like electrons that come from various origins such as solar winds, the planetary ionosphere, and moon volcanism. They become caught in powerful magnetic fields and are channeled into the upper atmosphere, where their interactions with gas particles, such as oxygen or nitrogen, set off spectacular bursts of light.
The auroras on Jupiter and Saturn are well-studied, but not much is known about the auroras of the giant ice planet Uranus. In 2011, the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope became the first Earth-based telescope to snap an image of the auroras on Uranus. In 2012 and 2014 a team led by an astronomer from Paris Observatory took a second look at the auroras using the ultraviolet capabilities of the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) installed on Hubble.
They tracked the interplanetary shocks caused by two powerful bursts of solar wind traveling from the sun to Uranus, then used Hubble to capture their effect on Uranus’ auroras — and found themselves observing the most intense auroras ever seen on the planet. By watching the auroras over time, they collected the first direct evidence that these powerful shimmering regions rotate with the planet. They also re-discovered Uranus’ long-lost magnetic poles, which were lost shortly after their discovery by Voyager 2 in 1986 due to uncertainties in measurements and the featureless planet surface.
For more information about Hubble, visit: www.nasa.gov/hubble
Credit: ESA/Hubble & NASA, L. Lamy / Observatoire de Paris
Text credit: European Space Agency
Last Updated: Aug. 6, 2017
Editor: Karl Hille

Voyager Mission Celebrates 30 Years Since Uranus | NASA

$
0
0
Voyager Mission Celebrates 30 Years Since Uranus | NASA



Voyager Mission 

Celebrates 30 Years 

Since Uranus

Uranus
Arriving at Uranus in 1986, Voyager 2 observed a bluish orb with extremely subtle features. A haze layer hid most of the planet's cloud features from view.
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
False-color and contrast-enhanced image of Uranus
The false-color and contrast-enhanced image of Uranus at right reveals subtle bands of concentric clouds surrounding the planet's south pole.
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
Expansive rings of Uranus
Voyager observed the expansive rings of Uranus, discovering two previously unknown rings
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
Uranus
Voyager 2 captured this moody parting shot of Uranus as the spacecraft sped off toward its next adventure at Neptune.
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
Uranus' icy moon Miranda
Uranus' icy moon Miranda wowed scientists during the Voyager encounter with its dramatically fractured landscapes.
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
Voyager 2 discovered 10 new moons during its encounter with Uranus,
Voyager 2 discovered 10 new moons during its encounter with Uranus, including the three pictured here: Portia (1986 U1), Cressida (1986 U3) and Rosalind (1986 U4).
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
Humanity has visited Uranus only once, and that was 30 years ago. NASA's Voyager 2 spacecraft got its closest look at the mysterious, distant, gaseous planet on Jan. 24, 1986.
Voyager 2 sent back stunning images of the planet and its moons during the flyby, which allowed for about 5.5 hours of close study. The spacecraft got within 50,600 miles (81,500 kilometers) of Uranus during that time.
"We knew Uranus would be different because it's tipped on its side, and we expected surprises," said Ed Stone, project scientist for the Voyager mission, based at the California Institute of Technology, Pasadena. Stone has served as project scientist since 1972, continuing in that role today.
Uranus revealed itself to be the coldest planet known in our solar system, even though it's not the farthest from the sun. This is because it has no internal heat source.
Scientists determined that the atmosphere of Uranus is 85 percent hydrogen and 15 percent helium. There was also evidence of a boiling ocean about 500 miles (800 kilometers) below the cloud tops.
Scientists found that Uranus has a magnetic field different from any they had ever encountered previously. At Mercury, Earth, Jupiter and Saturn, the magnetic field is aligned approximately with the rotational axis.
"Then we got to Uranus and saw that the poles were closer to the equator," Stone said. "Neptune turned out to be similar. The magnetic field was not quite centered with the center of the planet."
This surface magnetic field of Uranus was also stronger than that of Saturn. Data from Voyager 2 helped scientists determine that the magnetic tail of Uranus twists into a helix stretching 6 million miles (10 million kilometers) in the direction pointed away from the sun. Understanding how planetary magnetic fields interact with the sun is a key part of NASA’s goal to understand the very nature of space. Not only does studying the sun-planet connection provide information useful for space travel, but it helps shed light on the origins of planets and their potential for harboring life.
Voyager 2 also discovered 10 new moons (there are 27 total) and two new rings at the planet, which also proved fascinating. An icy moon called Miranda revealed a peculiar, varied landscape and evidence of active geologic activity in the past. While only about 300 miles (500 kilometers) in diameter, this small object boasts giant canyons that could be up to 12 times as deep as the Grand Canyon in Arizona. Miranda also has three unique features called "coronae," which are lightly cratered collections of ridges and valleys. Scientists think this moon could have been shattered and then reassembled.
Mission planners designed Voyager 2's Uranus encounter so that the spacecraft would receive a gravity assist to help it reach Neptune. In 1989, Voyager 2 added Neptune to its resume of first-ever looks.
                                                                   
"The Uranus encounter was very exciting for me," said Suzanne Dodd, project manager for Voyager, based at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, who began her career with the mission while Voyager 2 was en route to Uranus." It was my first planetary encounter and it was of a planet humanity had never seen up close before. Every new image showed more details of Uranus, and it had lots of surprises for the scientists. I hope another spacecraft will be sent to explore Uranus, to explore the planet in more detail, in my lifetime."
Voyager 2 was launched on Aug. 20, 1977, 16 days before its twin, Voyager 1. In August 2012, Voyager 1 made history as the first spacecraft to enter interstellar space, crossing the boundary encompassing our solar system's planets, sun and solar wind. Voyager 2 is also expected to reach interstellar space within the next several years.
The Voyagers were built by JPL, which continues to operate both spacecraft. JPL is a division of Caltech. For more information about the Voyager spacecraft, visit:
Elizabeth Landau
NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.
818-354-6425
elizabeth.landau@jpl.nasa.gov
2016-019
Last Updated: Aug. 7, 2017
Editor: Tony Greicius

Gravity Assist Podcast, Ice Giants (Uranus & Neptune) with Amy Simon | NASA

$
0
0
Gravity Assist Podcast, Ice Giants (Uranus & Neptune) with Amy Simon | NASA



Gravity Assist: Ice Giants 

(Uranus & Neptune) with 

Amy Simon





Beyond Saturn are two of the most misunderstood and bizarre planets in our solar system—the “ice giants” Uranus and Neptune. Did you know that Uranus has rings and appears to spin on its side? And that windy and intensely blue Neptune once had an Earth-sized Great Dark Spot? In this episode of Gravity Assist, NASA’s Jim Green and Amy Simon discuss Uranus, Neptune, and Neptune’s intriguing moon – Triton -- and what we still have to learn about these mysterious bodies. 
Transcript
Uranus and Neptune
Left: Arriving at Uranus in 1986, Voyager 2 observed a bluish orb with subtle features. A haze layer hid most of the planet's cloud features from view. Right: This image of Neptune was produced from Voyager 2 and shows the Great Dark Spot and its companion bright smudge.
Credits: Left: NASA/JPL-Caltech - Right: NASA
Jim Green:  Our solar system is a wondrous place with a single star, our Sun, and everything that orbits around it - planets, moons, asteroids and comets - what do we know about this beautiful solar system we call home? It's part of an even larger cosmos with billions of other solar systems.
Hi, I'm Jim Green, Director of Planetary Science at NASA, and this is Gravity Assist.
With me today is Dr. Amy Simon. She's a planetary scientist from NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center. And we're talking about the ice giants. These are two enormous planets in our outer solar system: Uranus and Neptune.
Now, Uranus and Neptune are probably the least known of all our planets, and the reason, of course, is only one spacecraft had visited them, and that's Voyager 2 – which flew by Uranus in '86 and Neptune in '89.
So, Amy, what do we mean by ice giants, and what are these objects all about?
Dr. Amy Simon.
Dr. Amy Simon, planetary scientist from NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center.
Credits: NASA
Amy Simon:  So, Uranus and Neptune are really unique in our solar system. They're very different planets than the other ones we think of. And part of the reason we call them ice giants is because they actually have a lot of water ice. So, while some of the other gas giant planets are mostly hydrogen and helium, they're predominately water and other ices.
Jim Green:  That's kind of amazing when we think about that. How were they able to acquire that?
Amy Simon:  So, these planets formed much further out in the solar system where there was a lot of ices available.  And they didn't quite form as big as, say, Jupiter or Saturn. So, they couldn't pull in quite as much gas. And so, that's kind of part of why we believe they're so different.
Jim Green:  You know, some of the simulations on how our planets form seem to indicate that they formed closer to the Sun, and then through gravitational interactions, were pushed out. And that includes Uranus and Neptune. Could they have acquired a lot of the Kuiper Belt objects as they were doing that?
Amy Simon:  Absolutely. As a matter of fact, we think that a lot of Neptune's moons are captured Kuiper Belt objects.
Jim Green:  Yeah, that kind of gives it away a little bit, I think.  And of course, that one moon that we love so much at Neptune called Triton, that's such an unusual body and was quite a shock when Voyager 2 went by. Why is that such a different moon?
Amy Simon:  So, Triton really is just such a bizarre world.  For one thing, we think it has geysers on it, but these aren't geysers like we're used to on Earth where we have hot water and steam.  It's so cold that we actually have nitrogen ice spewing out of the surface.  And so, that's really weird to start with.
But, if you move away from the south pole of Triton, then you get into this weird terrain that we call “cantaloupe terrain” because it looks like the skin of a cantaloupe. It's all wrinkly.  And we have no idea what's forming that.  And we've never even seen the other side of Triton, so who knows what's on the other side?
Tritan
Global color mosaic of Triton, taken in 1989 by Voyager 2 during its flyby of the Neptune system. The greenish areas includes what is called the cantaloupe terrain, whose origin is unknown, and a set of "cryovolcanic" landscapes apparently produced by icy-cold liquids (now frozen) erupted from Triton's interior.
Credits: NASA/JPL/USGS
Jim Green:  You know, are there any analogies between that cantaloupe terrain and some of the terrain we see on Pluto?
Amy Simon:  There is some, and a lot of this has to do with the fact that they're so cold.  And even though they're cold, they still have some sort of activity that's moving the ice around.  And so, we think that Triton and Pluto actually have quite a lot in common, and that's something we'd like to go back and learn a lot more about.
Jim Green:  You know, Triton's such a spectacular moon.  It's larger than the body Pluto, and as we talked about, may actually be a Kuiper Belt object.  But, it also has a funny orbit around Neptune.
Amy Simon:  Right. So, all the planets in our solar system move in the same direction. They all pretty much rotate in the same direction.  All their moons go around them in the same direction. But, Triton doesn't. It's retrograde. So, it's going backwards. And this is partly because we think it was captured, so it got too close to Neptune and got stuck there.
Jim Green:  How hard is it to see Uranus and Neptune from the Earth?
Amy Simon:  So, Uranus and Neptune are so far away, they're just really faint.  And so, the ancient astronomers that originally found the other planets didn't even see Uranus and Neptune. It took telescopes to find them in the first place.  So, if you were to go out and look, you'd have to know exactly where to look, and you'd still need a telescope to be able to find it.
Jim Green:  Since it required telescopes to see Uranus and Neptune, when were they discovered?
Amy Simon:  So, Uranus was first seen by Hershel in 1781.  Neptune wasn't seen for almost 50 years later, in 1846.
Jim Green:  You know, the discovery of Neptune is really kind of fascinating in the sense that observing Uranus really gave away the fact that there's something else out there. How did that go?
Amy Simon:  Yeah, you know, that's kind of interesting.  That's actually how they inferred all these outer planets was they were looking at the orbits of planets closer in and kept seeing them being tweaked a little bit. And they kept inferring there had to be something else out there or something with a lot of mass pulling them around. And so, that's kind of how we got an idea there was a Uranus and a Neptune.
But, even after that, we still thought there was more mass out there, which led to the hunt for Pluto.
Jim Green: You know, I think it took a long time to really find Pluto because of Uranus' perturbations. It had to go around the Sun at least once during that time period to be able to understand its full perturbations. But, it was that that really discovered Neptune.
Amy Simon: Correct. So, it was almost 80 years to the date when they found Pluto, and it's partly because they knew where to look.  So, you're looking at regions of the sky with photographic plates and trying to find something moving in the right place in the sky to be able to find it.
Jim Green:  Uranus is one of those planets that I think is so featureless. Why does it look like that?
Amy Simon: I think poor Uranus is misunderstood, actually.  Uranus is very bland in appearance most of the time. It's kind of a pale blue planet. It's the realpale blue dot. And part of it is just that it is so cold, and it doesn't have a lot of internal heat.  All of our outer planets or giant planets give off more heat than they receive from the Sun except for Uranus.  And we think that is slowing down convection inside the planet.  You don't get the equivalent of thunderstorms. So, you don't see the bright clouds on Uranus that you see on the other planets.
Jim Green:  Another really fascinating aspect about Uranus is its rotational axis. It's so different than all the others.  Why is that?
Amy Simon: Yeah, that's another big puzzle. So, Uranus is tilted over on its side. So, if you were looking straight up in the solar system, that would be zero degrees. It's tilted over 98 degrees. So, it is pretty much rolling around on its side.  And we have no way of making it do that. And so, the best guess we have at the moment is that, while it was forming, it collided with something even bigger or as big, and it got knocked over.  And so, that's a real puzzle when we try to explain how the solar system formed.
Jim Green:  Are all the Uranus moons in the same plane in the equatorial region?
Amy Simon:  They are. And so, it's a little different than what we can see on the other planets because it is tilted on its side.  We get a different view than we do when we fly by other planets.
Jim Green:  You know, in addition to the fabulous moons that Uranus has, doesn't it have rings?
Amy Simon:  That's correct, actually. All of the outer planets have rings around them. And Uranus' are very narrow. It has about nine rings. It's--they're hard to see because they are so narrow.  We were able to see them with Voyager 2, and that's how we discovered them.
But, rings are great because they're one way that we actually can do kind of the equivalent of seismology on the planets. We can look at how the rings oscillate and how their shapes change and learn a little bit about the inside of the planets.
Jim Green:  So, the planet must be shaking and moving the rings back and forth. That's pretty astounding.
Amy Simon:  Yeah, it really is unique. And we've learned this while look at the other planets, at Saturn especially, because it has such extensive rings. But, the fact that we have rings at all around the outer planets tells us they're pretty common. But, they're also very different from each planet, and that's just, you know, interesting. It tells us that we don't actually know what forms a ring and keeps a ring.
Jim Green: Now, does Uranus have a magnetic field?
Amy Simon: It does have a magnetic field, and it's a lot different than what we have here on Earth. So, here on Earth, we have a north magnetic pole and a south magnetic pole. For both Uranus and Neptune, actually, that is offset from the center.  So, it's not directly in the center of the planet, and it's also not just a north and south. It's actually kind of a “multi” pole.
So, if you could think about two magnets crossed with each other, it's almost like that. It's really strange.
Jim Green:  So, we've really got to go back to these planets and visit them. There's so much for us to learn.
Amy Simon:  Absolutely.
Jim Green:  Well, I'm here with Amy Simon, planetary scientist from NASA Goddard, and we're talking about Uranus and Neptune, our ice giants.
What did Voyager 2 discover about Neptune during its fly-by that really surprised us?
Amy Simon:  So, Neptune and Uranus are not at all like each other in a lot of ways. Besides being much more Earth-like in its tilt--Neptune's tilted about 28 degrees--it's not the same color as Uranus.  So, it's a deeper blue, and when we got there, we were shocked to see it had a Great Dark Spot. So, it had a big storm that was raging in the atmosphere of Neptune.
Neptune Great Dark Spot
This photograph shows the last face on view of the Great Dark Spot that Voyager will make with the narrow angle camera. The image was shuttered 45 hours before closest approach at a distance of 2.8 million kilometers (1.7 million miles). The smallest structures that can be seen are of an order of 50 kilometers (31 miles). The image shows feathery white clouds that overlie the boundary of the dark and light blue regions. The pinwheel (spiral) structure of both the dark boundary and the white cirrus suggest a storm system rotating counterclockwise. Periodic small scale patterns in the white cloud, possibly waves, are short lived and do not persist from one Neptunian rotation to the next.
Credits: NASA/JPL
Jim Green: A dark spot? You mean sort of like the (Great) Red Spot on Jupiter?
Amy Simon:  Exactly the same type of thing. It's a gigantic anti-cyclone, so it's a high-pressure storm. And it was raging throughout the entire fly-by. But, when we looked again with Hubble when we could first look at Neptune, it was gone.
Jim Green: You know, on Jupiter and Saturn, we're seeing lightning. And has there ever been lightning found on Uranus and Neptune?
Amy Simon: We haven't seen lightning, but that’s partly because we expect lightning to form in the water ice clouds.  And on these cold planets, the water ice is way down deep. So, we're actually seeing methane ice clouds when we see clouds on Neptune, and we haven't seen lightning yet.
Jim Green:  Does Neptune have a ring, also?  And what do we know about it?
Amy Simon:  So, Neptune does have rings, as well, but these are not as well formed as what we see on the other planets.  They're kind of clumps.  So, we see arcs --partial rings--at various points around the planet.
Jim Green:  You know, in addition to Voyager 2 discovering the rings, there's also other techniques that we've used to discover and look at the rings of Uranus and Neptune. What's the most important technique?
Amy Simon:  The best technique we have, especially since we're not up close to them, is to use stars. When a star passes behind the planet, it gets dimmed out. Well, it turns out, when it passes behind the rings, the same thing happens. So, we can watch a star twinkling in and out as it goes behind Neptune and its rings.
Jim Green: Any other moons besides Triton that are notable?
Amy Simon: Both Neptune and Uranus actually have quite a few satellites around them. In the case of Uranus, they're all fairly small, although we think some of them do have interesting ice on the surface, as well. But, for Neptune, there's that one big moon Triton, and then the rest are much smaller. So, it's more similar to what we see around Saturn.
Jim Green:  You know, it'd be fantastic to go back to either one of these and take a look at the moons more carefully.  I'd be willing to bet we could find some captured comets, too.
Amy Simon:  Oh, I think we'd find all sorts of interesting things. We have no idea how many of these moons might be active and actually helping to form that ring system, for example.  That's what we found at Saturn with Enceladus. And the fact that we haven't seen the other side of any of these moons, we have no idea what's out there.
Jim Green: You know, we know enough about Uranus and Neptune, just like we knew about Saturn before Cassini got there, because it was only through the Voyager flybys that did that.  And so, I think we're gonna learn an enormous amount when we have an opportunity to get back and really spend some time at Uranus and Neptune. What are some of the mission ideas that we've been talking about?
Amy Simon:  So, we've studied quite a lot of different ways to get out to Uranus and Neptune. I think the biggest problem is they're just so far away, so you can't get out there very fast.
So, we've looked into could you do a flyby mission, which is similar to what Voyager 2 did, and if you did that, what would you add? And I think the primary thing we'd add to any mission is an atmospheric probe, because we want to understand what the layers are in the atmosphere—what the temperatures are.  But, we also looked at orbiters, and these are nice because it gives you a chance to explore that whole system - the rings, the moons, Triton in particular - to see what's going on on all sides of those different moons.
Jim Green:  When we look at other planets around other stars and we try to figure out what the most populous (type of) (exo)planet is, it turns out to be about the size of Uranus and Neptune. So, this tells us that these are objects we really need to study further. How are we studying them today?
Amy Simon:  Absolutely. And even to do our own mission to one of these planets, we want to know more before we get there.  And so, we're using the Hubble Space Telescope. We're actually looking every year now with Hubble at both of these planets.  We've also been using the Kepler Astrophysical Telescope to look at the light curves and study how their clouds are changing.  Even if we can't see the clouds, we can see the change in their light curves.
So, we're using as many different ground based and space based observatories as we can to look at both Uranus and Neptune.
Neptune Clouds Showing Vertical Relief
This Voyager 2 high resolution color image, taken 2 hours before closest approach, provides obvious evidence of vertical relief in Neptune's bright cloud streaks
Credits: NASA/JPL
Jim Green:  I'm here with Amy Simon, and we're talking about the ice giants, Uranus and Neptune.
What kind of things are we finding out from Hubble and Kepler observations?
Amy Simon:  So, at the moment, we're seeing a lot more clouds on Neptune, and we're finding that they vary on really short time scales, and that's partly because it has winds that blow hundreds of miles an hour.  So, those clouds change really fast.  But, we've actually in the last few years seen another Great Dark Spot. So, we watched one--well, we discovered it with Hubble, and we've been able to watch it get smaller and eventually disappear.
And we think they move around a little bit, too, which is interesting.
Uranus, on the other hand, has been really, really quiet.  So, when it passed its equinox, so kind of its springtime, suddenly, we saw an outbreak of clouds all over the place, and we haven't seen a whole lot since then. We just see occasional ones. And so, they really are quite different planets from each other.
Jim Green:  You know, one of the things that we found by Cassini at Saturn was the rings were really shading the planet during certain seasons and causing all kinds of changes in the atmosphere. How long does it take for seasons on Uranus and Neptune?
Amy Simon:  So, a year on Uranus is about 84 years.  So, each of the seasons is 21 years. And because it's tilted over on its side, that means that, for example, the south pole wouldn't see sunlight for about 40 years.  So, it's got really extreme seasons, which help to drive the weather.
For Neptune, it takes 164 years to go around the Sun, so almost twice as long, but it doesn't have that extreme tilt.  And we haven't, at least at this point, been able to observe any seasonal changes because we haven't been observing long enough.
Jim Green:  You know, I ask all my guests how they got into this business, what was their gravity assist that propelled them forward and made them the scientist they are today. Amy, what's yours?
Amy Simon:  So, I think I had a two-body gravity assist, actually, the first one being when the shuttle program came around and Sally Ride, I really wanted to be an astronaut, be the first woman on Mars. But, honestly, the second one was Voyager 2 and when it flew by Uranus and Neptune and you saw all these exotic worlds and pink ice and all sorts of colors, blue, I was so just so enthralled by the planets, I really wanted to be a planetary scientist.
Jim Green:  I can resonate with that. Those are just tremendous events that have happened in our space program, and like many others, they have indeed inspired another generation.
Amy, you've been working for Goddard now for several years.  How did you become an employee for NASA?
Amy Simon:  My start actually was working on Jupiter on the Galileo mission, and I was doing that as a student and got invited to do a post-doctoral position working Galileo, at which point I got asked if I would like to help out with Cassini, which was on its way to Saturn. And the instrument I was working at was based at NASA Goddard. And so, eventually, I moved down to NASA Goddard.
Jim Green: As a civil servant, you provide opportunities during the summer for students to come and work. How many students have been involved in your organization?
Amy Simon: Oh, absolutely. It depends on the summer, but some summers, we have hundreds and hundreds of students at the center doing all sorts of projects from engineering to science and through all of the different science fields that we have.
Jim Green: You know, for any student who would like to work during the summer, it's www.nasa.gov, and do a search on summer employment. (Also, see NASA Pathways program:  https://nasajobs.nasa.gov/studentopps/pathways.htm)
Join us next time as we continue our virtual tour of the solar system.  I'm Jim Green, and this is your Gravity Assist.
Love NASA science? Follow NASA’s Science Chief Thomas Zurbuchen on Twitter using @Dr_ThomasZ and check out #ScienceInSeconds for short videos.

And be sure to sample additional NASA podcasts: Houston: We Have a Podcast from Johnson Space Center, Houston, and NASA in Silicon Valley from Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California.
Last Updated: Jan. 17, 2018
Editor: Gary Daines

Hubble Watches Neptune’s Dark Storm Die

Hubble Sees Neptune's Mysterious Shrinking Storm | NASA

$
0
0
Hubble Sees Neptune's Mysterious Shrinking Storm | NASA



Hubble Sees Neptune's 

Mysterious Shrinking Storm

Three billion miles away on the farthest known major planet in our solar system, an ominous, dark storm – once big enough to stretch across the Atlantic Ocean from Boston to Portugal – is shrinking out of existence as seen in pictures of Neptune taken by NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope.
Immense dark storms on Neptune were first discovered in the late 1980s by NASA’s Voyager 2 spacecraft. Since then, only Hubble has had the sharpness in blue light to track these elusive features that have played a game of peek-a-boo over the years. Hubble found two dark storms that appeared in the mid-1990s and then vanished. This latest storm was first seen in 2015, but is now shrinking.
For the first time, NASA's Hubble Space Telescope has captured time-lapse images of a large, dark storm on Neptune shrinking out of existence.
Credits: NASA Goddard's Scientific Visualization Studio
Like Jupiter’s Great Red Spot (GRS), the storm swirls in an anti-cyclonic direction and is dredging up material from deep inside the ice giant planet’s atmosphere. The elusive feature gives astronomers a unique opportunity to study Neptune’s deep winds, which can’t be directly measured.
The dark spot material may be hydrogen sulfide, with the pungent smell of rotten eggs. Joshua Tollefson from the University of California at Berkeley explained, “The particles themselves are still highly reflective; they are just slightly darker than the particles in the surrounding atmosphere.”
Unlike Jupiter’s GRS, which has been visible for at least 200 years, Neptune’s dark vortices only last a few years. This is the first one that actually has been photographed as it is dying.
“We have no evidence of how these vortices are formed or how fast they rotate,” said Agustín Sánchez-Lavega from the University of the Basque Country in Spain. “It is most likely that they arise from an instability in the sheared eastward and westward winds.”
four part image with globes of neptune over BW closeups
This series of Hubble Space Telescope images taken over 2 years tracks the demise of a giant dark vortex on the planet Neptune. The oval-shaped spot has shrunk from 3,100 miles across its long axis to 2,300 miles across, over the Hubble observation period.
Credits: NASA, ESA, and M.H. Wong and A.I. Hsu (UC Berkeley)
The dark vortex is behaving differently from what planet-watchers predicted. “It looks like we’re capturing the demise of this dark vortex, and it’s different from what well-known studies led us to expect,” said Michael H. Wong of the University of California at Berkeley, referring to work by Ray LeBeau (now at St. Louis University) and Tim Dowling’s team at the University of Louisville. “Their dynamical simulations said that anticyclones under Neptune’s wind shear would probably drift toward the equator. We thought that once the vortex got too close to the equator, it would break up and perhaps create a spectacular outburst of cloud activity.”
But the dark spot, which was first seen at mid-southern latitudes, has apparently faded away rather than going out with a bang. That may be related to the surprising direction of its measured drift: toward the south pole, instead of northward toward the equator. Unlike Jupiter’s GRS, the Neptune spot is not as tightly constrained by numerous alternating wind jets (seen as bands in Jupiter’s atmosphere). Neptune seems to only have three broad jets: a westward one at the equator, and eastward ones around the north and south poles. The vortex should be free to change traffic lanes and cruise anywhere in between the jets.
“No facilities other than Hubble and Voyager have observed these vortices. For now, only Hubble can provide the data we need to understand how common or rare these fascinating neptunian weather systems may be,” said Wong.
The first images of the dark vortex are from the Outer Planet Atmospheres Legacy (OPAL) program, a long-term Hubble project that annually captures global maps of our solar system’s four outer planets. Only Hubble has the unique capability to probe these worlds in ultraviolet light, which yields important information not available to other present-day telescopes. Additional data, from a Hubble program targeting the dark vortex, are from an international team including Wong, Tollefson, Sánchez-Lavega, Andrew Hsu, Imke de Pater, Amy Simon, Ricardo Hueso, Lawrence Sromovsky, Patrick Fry, Statia Luszcz-Cook, Heidi Hammel, Marc Delcroix, Katherine de Kleer, Glenn Orton, and Christoph Baranec.
Wong’s paper appears online in the Astronomical Journal on Feb. 15, 2018.
The Hubble Space Telescope is a project of international cooperation between NASA and ESA (European Space Agency). NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, manages the telescope. The Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI) in Baltimore conducts Hubble science operations. STScI is operated for NASA by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., in Washington, D.C.
For additional imagery, visit: http://hubblesite.org/news_release/news/2018-08
For NASA’s Hubble web page, visit: www.nasa.gov/hubble

Ray Villard
Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
410-338-4514
villard@stsci.edu
Last Updated: Feb. 15, 2018
Editor: Karl Hille

Kepler Observes Neptune Dance with Its Moons | NASA

$
0
0
Kepler Observes Neptune Dance with Its Moons | NASA



Kepler observes Neptune and its moons

Kepler Observes 

Neptune Dance 

with Its Moons

NASA's Kepler spacecraft, known for its planet-hunting prowess of other stars, is also studying solar system objects. In its new K2 mission, Neptune and two of its moons, Triton and Nereid, have been imaged. The movie illustrates 70 days of uninterrupted observation making this one of the longer continuous studies of an outer solar system object.
Seventy days worth of solar system observations from NASA's Kepler spacecraft, taken during its reinvented "K2" mission, are highlighted in this sped-up movie. The planet Neptune appears on day 15, followed by its moon Triton, which looks small and faint. Keen-eyed observers can also spot Neptune's tiny moon Nereid at day 24. Neptune is not moving backward but appears to do so because of the changing position of the Kepler spacecraft as it orbits around the sun.
Credits: NASA Ames/SETI Institute/J. Rowe
The movie, based on 101,580 images taken from November 2014 through January 2015 during K2's Campaign 3, reveals the perpetual clockwork of our solar system. The 70-day timespan is compressed into 34 seconds with the number of days noted in the top right corner.
Neptune appears on day 15 but does not travel alone in the video. The small faint object closely orbiting is its large moon Triton, which circles Neptune every 5.8 days. Appearing from the left at day 24, keen-eyed observers can also spot the tiny moon Nereid in its slow 360-day orbit around the planet. A few fast-moving asteroids make cameo appearances in the movie, showing up as streaks across the K2 field of view. The red dots are a few of the stars K2 examines in its search for transiting planets outside of our solar system.
Neptune's atmosphere reflects sunlight creating a bright appearance. The reflected light floods a number of pixels of the spacecraft's on board camera, producing the bright spikes extending above and below the planet. The celestial bodies in the stitched-together images are colored red to represent the wavelength response of the spacecraft's camera. In reality, Neptune is deep blue in color and its moons and the speeding asteroids are light grey while the background stars appear white from a distance.
Relative orbit speeds explain the interesting motion of Neptune and its moons beginning at day 42. Inner planets like Earth orbit more quickly than outer planets like Neptune. In the movie, Neptune’s apparent motion relative to the stationary stars is mostly due to the circular 372-day orbit of the Kepler spacecraft around the sun. If you look at distant objects and move your head back and forth, you will notice that objects close to you will also appear to move back and forth, relative to objects far away. The same concept is producing the apparent motion of Neptune.
While NASA’s Kepler spacecraft is known for its discoveries of planets around other stars, an international team of astronomers plans to use these data to track Neptune’s weather and probe the planet’s internal structure by studying subtle brightness fluctuations that can only be observed with K2.
NASA's Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California, manages the Kepler and K2 missions for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate. NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, managed Kepler mission development. Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. operates the flight system with support from the Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics at the University of Colorado in Boulder.
During its K2 campaign, NASA's Kepler spacecraft observed the eighth planet in our solar system, Neptune. Kepler detected small changes in Neptune's brightness caused by the planet's daily rotation, the movement of clouds, and even seismic waves from the sun itself. Originally designed to search for exoplanets (planets around other stars), Kepler's observations of Neptune pave the way for future studies of weather and climate beyond our solar system.
Credits: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center /Dan Gallagher

Media contact:
Michele Johnson
Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif.
650-604-6982
michele.johnson@nasa.go
Last Updated: Aug. 8, 2017
Editor: Michele Johnson

New Horizons Captures Record-Breaking Images in the Kuiper Belt | NASA

$
0
0
New Horizons Captures Record-Breaking Images in the Kuiper Belt | NASA



New Horizons Captures 

Record-Breaking Images 

in the Kuiper Belt

These December 2017 false-color images of KBOs 2012 HZ84 and 2012 HE85 are, for now, the farthest from Earth ever captured
With its Long Range Reconnaissance Imager (LORRI), New Horizons has observed several Kuiper Belt objects (KBOs) and dwarf planets at unique phase angles, as well as Centaurs at extremely high phase angles to search for forward-scattering rings or dust. These December 2017 false-color images of KBOs 2012 HZ84 (left) and 2012 HE85 are, for now, the farthest from Earth ever captured by a spacecraft. They're also the closest-ever images of Kuiper Belt objects.
Credits: NASA/JHUAPL/SwRI
“New Horizons has long been a mission of firsts — first to explore Pluto, first to explore the Kuiper Belt, fastest spacecraft ever launched,” said New Horizons Principal Investigator Alan Stern, of the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado. “And now, we’ve been able to make images farther from Earth than any spacecraft in history.”
NASA’s New Horizons spacecraft recently turned its telescopic camera toward a field of stars, snapped an image – and made history.
The routine calibration frame of the “Wishing Well” galactic open star cluster, made by the Long Range Reconnaissance Imager (LORRI) on Dec. 5, was taken when New Horizons was 3.79 billion miles (6.12 billion kilometers, or 40.9 astronomical units) from Earth – making it, for a time, the farthest image ever made from Earth.
New Horizons was even farther from home than NASA’s Voyager 1 when it captured the famous “Pale Blue Dot” image of Earth. That picture was part of a composite of 60 images looking back at the solar system, on Feb. 14, 1990, when Voyager was 3.75 billion miles (6.06 billion kilometers, or about 40.5 astronomical units [AU]) from Earth. Voyager 1’s cameras were turned off shortly after that portrait, leaving its distance record unchallenged for more than 27 years.
LORRI broke its own record just two hours later with images of Kuiper Belt objects 2012 HZ84 and 2012 HE85 – further demonstrating how nothing stands still when you’re covering more than 700,000 miles (1.1 million kilometers) of space each day.
this New Horizons LORRI frame of the "Wishing Well" star cluster was the farthest image ever made by a spacecraft
For a short time, this New Horizons Long Range Reconnaissance Imager (LORRI) frame of the "Wishing Well" star cluster, taken Dec. 5, 2017, was the farthest image ever made by a spacecraft, breaking a 27-year record set by Voyager 1. About two hours later, New Horizons later broke the record again.
Credits: NASA/JHUAPL/SwRI
Distance and Speed
New Horizons is just the fifth spacecraft to speed beyond the outer planets, so many of its activities set distance records. On Dec. 9 it carried out the most-distant course-correction maneuver ever, as the mission team guided the spacecraft toward a close encounter with a KBO named 2014 MU69 on Jan. 1, 2019. That New Year’s flight past MU69 will be the farthest planetary encounter in history, happening one billion miles beyond the Pluto system – which New Horizons famously explored in July 2015.
During its extended mission in the Kuiper Belt, which began in 2017, New Horizons is aiming to observe at least two-dozen other KBOs, dwarf planets and “Centaurs,” former KBOs in unstable orbits that cross the orbits of the giant planets. Mission scientists study the images to determine the objects’ shapes and surface properties, and to check for moons and rings. The spacecraft also is making nearly continuous measurements of the plasma, dust and neutral-gas environment along its path. 
The New Horizons spacecraft is healthy and is currently in hibernation. Mission controllers at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory in Laurel, Maryland, will bring the spacecraft out of its electronic slumber on June 4 and begin a series of system checkouts and other activities to prepare New Horizons for the MU69 encounter.
Last Updated: Feb. 8, 2018
Editor: Bill Keeter

Gravity Assist Podcast, The Kuiper Belt with Alan Stern | NASA

$
0
0
Gravity Assist Podcast, The Kuiper Belt with Alan Stern | NASA



Gravity Assist: 

The Kuiper Belt 

with Alan Stern


Artist's concept of NASA’s New Horizons spacecraft flying by 2014 MU69 on Jan. 1, 2019
Artist's concept of NASA’s New Horizons spacecraft flying by 2014 MU69 on Jan. 1, 2019. Early observations hint at the Kuiper Belt object being either a binary orbiting pair or a contact (stuck together) pair of nearly like-sized bodies with diameters near 20 and 18 kilometers (12 and 11 miles).
Credits: NASA/JHUAPL/SwRI/Carlos Hernandez
After making history by flying by Pluto in 2015, NASA’s New Horizons spacecraft is speeding toward a New Year’s Day 2019 flyby of a mysterious world in the outer realm of the solar system. In this episode of Gravity Assist, Jim Green talks with New Horizons Principal Investigator Alan Stern about what we’ve learned about Kuiper Belt object 2014 MU69 and the remarkable story of how -- against all odds -- the New Horizons team captured MU69’s fleeting shadow on Earth as the object passed in front of a distant star.
TRANSCRIPT:
New Horizons Principal Investigator Alan Stern of the Southwest Research InsDr. Jim Green, NASA’s director of planetary science.
New Horizons Principal Investigator Alan Stern of the Southwest Research Institute and Jim Green, NASA’s director of planetary science.
Credits: NASA
Jim Green:  Our solar system is a wondrous place with a single star, our Sun, and everything that orbits around it, planets, moons, asteroids and comets. What do we know about this beautiful solar system we call home? It’s part of an even larger cosmos with billions of other solar systems. Hi, I’m Jim Green, Director of Planetary Science at NASA, and this is Gravity Assist. 
With me today is Alan Stern, the principal investigator of the New Horizons mission. New Horizons has made a fabulous historic flyby of Pluto just two years ago, and now it’s on its way into a region we call the Kuiper Belt. And, it’s gone a rendezvous with a very mysterious world, further than we’ve ever gone before, something we all need to pay attention to so we can see what this is all about.  You know, Alan, welcome.
Alan Stern:  Thank you, Jim. It’s great to be here.
Jim Green: You know, I think many people are surprised about the solar system, in fact, that it really doesn’t stop at Pluto. There’s something beyond it. When did the concept of the Kuiper Belt come about?
Alan Stern: Well, the concept actually came about just about the time that Pluto was discovered in 1930. And, a number of astronomers thought that perhaps Pluto was kind of the tip of the iceberg and if we could see deeper with future telescopes, we’d discover a lot more out there. The most famous argument made for that was by Gerard Kuiper, who was a giant in planetary science in the middle of the 20th century, and it sort of stuck with his name on it.
The discovery of the Kuiper Belt, though, had to wait for technology to develop, much better detectors, CCD (charge-coupled device) detectors, and fast computers to analyze mountains of data. And, so it was actually the 1990s before the first Kuiper Belt object other than Pluto was discovered. And, of course, that was much--a much smaller body, as most everything is. Pluto’s actually the largest thing in the Kuiper Belt.
But, it turns out, most importantly, the Kuiper Belt is dotted with other small planets like Pluto that no one really expected at all, that Pluto isn’t the misfit of the outer solar system. It was kind of the harbinger of things to come.
Jim Green:  Yeah, it’s really been fascinating watching these objects being discovered. In fact, many of them are binary.
Alan Stern:  A lot of them are binary. Pluto itself is a binary. In fact, even this tiny little one that we’re going after as our next flyby target may well be a binary. So, that’s telling us something about the original formation conditions, because we don’t see binary planets down in the inner solar system. Venus isn’t a binary, Mars isn’t a binary, Mercury isn’t a binary. Even the Earth/Moon system isn’t really a binary.
But, in the Kuiper Belt, they’re very common. So, something was very different back then in that place that made this binary formation mechanism routine.
Jim Green:  Now, when you talk about binary, you mean that both the primary and secondary bodies are so massive, that they’re actually orbiting a barycenterthat exists between them.
Alan Stern: Right. It pretty much means that they’re like- sized objects orbiting one another.
Jim Green: What’s really fantastic about the next step that New Horizons is taking, going to MU69, is how that object was discovered. Can you give us a little background on that?
Alan Stern: You know, we knew from the beginning when we designed New Horizons that its mission was to go on exploring after Pluto, deeper in the Kuiper Belt. And, we put the fuel on board and the communications capability on board, and we designed the cameras to work even further from the Sun, so forth and so on.  And, then after we got launched, we started using the biggest telescopes in the world to look for possible targets.
And, although we found many, none were within our fuel reach. And, as we started getting closer and closer to Pluto, I got kind of worried that we just weren’t going to be able to carry it out from the ground. And, so we asked for NASA’s help and the help came in the form of the Hubble Space Telescope, which spent a good bit of time in the summer of 2014, the year before we got to Pluto, scanning the region behind Pluto where New Horizons would be headed next, to find targets.
And, we found several and MU69 was the most easily reached of that group. And that’s what we’re bearing down on next.
Jim Green:  What’s really fascinating that happened this summer was, of course, the opportunity that MU69 would pass between us and stars, at distant stars. And, so those occultations occurred, but to me, they were unbelievable in the way you put together your teams and deployed them, and actually made some unique observations.
Alan Stern:  Yeah, well credit really goes to the people on those teams, and they were led by Marc Buie, who’s a part of New Horizons, in doing really state-of-the-art, more advanced calculations than had ever been done before, for where
Marc Buie
Marc Buie, New Horizons occultation campaign lead, holds up five fingers to represent the number of mobile telescopes in Argentina initially thought to have detected the fleeting shadow of 2014 MU69. The New Horizons spacecraft will fly by the ancient Kuiper Belt object on Jan. 1, 2019.
Credits: NASA/JHUAPL/SwRI/Adriana Ocampo
the shadow of something so small, like MU69, would fly across the Earth, and getting telescopes in the right place at the right time, in the shadow, way down in South America, in Patagonia, in the middle of the winter, in one of the windiest places in Patagonia. And, it all worked out. Five telescopes saw MU69 make this particular nondescript star wink out.
wink of a star 0.2
Now you see it, now you don’t: NASA’s New Horizons team trained mobile telescopes on an unnamed star (center) from rural Argentina on July 17, 2017. A Kuiper Belt object 4.1 billion miles from Earth -- known as 2014 MU69 -- briefly blocked the light from the background star, in what’s called an occultation. The time difference between frames is 200 milliseconds, or 0.2 seconds. This data helps scientists to better measure the shape, size and environment around the object; the New Horizons spacecraft will fly by this ancient relic of solar system formation on Jan. 1, 2019.
Credits: NASA/JHUAPL/SwRI
But, each telescope saw it wink out for a different period of time, because it observed from a little bit different location.  And, therefore, we could actually use those individual tracks to paint out the shape of MU69, get its size and its surface reflectivity. The most interesting result probably is that it looks like it could be a double itself, a binary, either a contact binary, where the two lobes are actually touching, or two objects in orbit around one another, like Pluto and Charon, but on a much tinier scale.
Jim Green:  Is there another opportunity where we could catch it in another occultation?
Alan Stern:  There is another one coming next August across some pretty rainy parts of South America, unfortunately, and some pretty dangerous parts of North Africa, with a lot of Atlantic Ocean in between. So, we’re looking at ways to go after that that would be about six months before our next flyby, the flyby of MU69, and whether we use ships or airplanes or perhaps find some places where the weather’s good enough and the local conditions are safe enough to put telescopes on the ground. We could learn a lot that would help give us some more advanced warning about what we’re going to find when we get there at the holidays of 2018.
Jim Green:  You know, what also amazes me is how bright MU69 is. In fact, its magnitude 27. And, for those astronomers out there, it means there’s no way any Earth telescope would be able to see it. So, it’s really one that had to be found by Hubble.
Alan Stern: It’s true, only the Hubble, because it’s above the atmosphere, could do it. And, we even, after we found MU69, knew exactly where to look. We’d look with very large telescopes, like the Keckand the Gemini telescopes and others, Subaru, and they’ve never spotted it from the ground. In fact, the only time it’s been spotted except for Hubble was in those occultations.
Jim Green: Just a few photons.
Alan Stern: It’s extremely faint. Twenty-seventh magnitude means that it’s almost ten million times fainter than Pluto, which itself is a million times too faint for your eye to see.  It’s just mind boggling.
Jim Green: [Laughter] Yeah, to me, this was clearly the greatest occultation captured that we’ve ever done on this planet.
Alan Stern: It was a major breakthrough. What Buie and his team pulled off was a masterstroke in not only prediction, but execution. And, they made it look easy. It was not. It was really beyond the state-of-the-art until they did it.
Jim Green: That really tells you what it takes to put together a team of talented people and let them do their work, you know?
Alan Stern:  Yeah. And, I was on two of the occultation expeditions and, you know, folks were working 20 hours a day, in very harsh conditions, in the cold in the winter and the wind, and nights and weekends. And, they were all very highly motivated to do it, and they pulled it off.
Jim Green:  You know, how that must have gone in terms of being able to put on an array of telescopes. I think you had something like 24 telescopes in a line?
Alan Stern:  We did. We set them up like a fence line, perpendicular to the path, so we would catch our prey, even if it was a little north or south of where we were going to be. We got lots of help from the locals, the Argentinian locals, the national government, their space agency, CONAE, as well as the Governor and the Mayor of the town that we were in gave us all kinds of support, ranging from police escorts to blocking the highway so that the trucks wouldn’t come down with their bright headlights and ruin the observations, weather support, first aid.
They really bent over backwards to help, because, you know, they found out NASA was in town. And, to them, that was really something to be a part of. That NASA brand was what did the trick. That, and one very helpful translator named Adriana Ocampo.
Adriana C. Ocampo
Adriana C. Ocampo, planetary geologist and the Lead Program Executive of the NASA Science Mission Directorate’s New Frontiers Program.
Credits: NASA
Jim Green: Yeah, she’s a rock star down there, that’s for sure, a fabulous scientist that had worked on Chicxulub and the extinction of the dinosaurs. But, you know, out of the three occultations, two we caught on ground, but one we had to do something else with.
Alan Stern: One of them was over the ocean, and there are no observatories floating around in the ocean. So, we took NASA’s biggest airborne observatory called SOFIA and it was being based for the summer down in Christchurch, New Zealand to make observations of the southern sky. And, we were awarded time to go fly it up to the occultation path, several thousand miles north, near Tahiti.
I was on that mission as well. We flew five hours out of Christchurch north, did a U-turn and came back, and just as we turned south, the occultation event occurred, and then flew all the way back to Christchurch with the data. And, here’s this big lumbering 747 with a telescope the size of Hubble inside of it, looking out of a door, a hatch in the side, flying at 45,000 feet with a flight crew and a telescope crew and the science crew. And, you know, they were so on target that they were less than five wingspans off target at the exact moment of the occultation. It’s an amazing accomplishment.
Jim Green:  Yeah, it is amazing, unbelievable. So, with all of the data in hand, you’re getting a picture of, perhaps, it being a binary?
Alan Stern: Uh-huh.
Jim Green: What about debris in the area? You know, we’re always worried about the safety of our spacecraft as we fly through.
Alan Stern: Yeah, and we’re worried, primarily, because we’re going so fast. You know, we’re going at ten miles per second. So even if you hit something small, it’s a very powerful wallop, and there’s basically no good place to hit New Horizons.
If you do computer modeling of that, anything, even a rice pellet that hit the spacecraft will cut a fuel line or take out a circuit board or destroy an instrument or what have you. So, we’re trying to certify the path as best we can. And, the occultations help us with that, because when--before and after you occult the hard body itself, you can look for dips due to rings, dips in the light due to rings or other debris structures that could be in orbit.
Now, fortunately, we didn’t find any. So, that tells us that some of the worst disaster scenarios that could be out there aren’t out there at MU69. They might be somewhere else, but they’re not at MU69.
But, still, we have to look even harder to certify the path on approach. We’ll do that with our own telescopes on board, and our own cameras on board, by sending that data back to Earth throughout the fall of 2018, and we’ll be scrutinizing those images as best we can. And, if we find anything that’s concerning, we’ve planned an entire backup flyby at a greater distance, which is presumably safer, to give ourselves some options for still getting good data, but avoiding danger if it’s in our path for the very closest approach.
Jim Green: I’m Jim Green and I’m here with Alan Stern, talking about the Kuiper Belt and what’s next for New Horizons.  You know, one of the things that I always wondered about is our comets. We get comets from very far away from the Oort Cloud, but, you know, there’s got to be comets coming out of the Kuiper Belt, too. So, what do you think the relationship between what we have, Pluto like objects, and comets are?
Alan Stern:  Well, that’s a really good question. We know that comets, the short period comets, come from the Kuiper Belt.  And, we know that--we’ve seen quite a number of those up close with spacecraft missions now. Rosetta recently orbited one for two years, but we had various American and European spacecraft fly by comets, also some old Soviet spacecraft that flew by comets in the 80s.
They don’t look anything like planets. They’re small and lumpy and they don’t have the geological processes that big worlds, like Pluto, that, you know, would basically span the United States in diameter, have. And, also their composition turns out to be quite different.
We see on the surface of Pluto much more exotic ices than we see on the surfaces of comets, things like nitrogen ice that are very rare in comets. And, we see a bound atmosphere that we don’t see around comets. So, just like the asteroids and the Earth are different, the comets and the small planets of the Kuiper Belt are very different.
But, they’re all teaching us about the origin of the solar system and about the types of objects we can expect to find around other stars. And, so it’s all part of the basic exploration that we do, as we open up the solar system to space travel.
Jim Green:  New Horizons, after it flies by MU69 on January 1st, 2019--and I know where I’ll be when that occurs.
Alan Stern:  Me, too.
Jim Green:  But, it’s heading out. It’s heading out of the solar system. Is it going in the same direction that the Voyagers are?
Alan Stern:  It is going in roughly the same direction as the Voyagers. And, like the Voyagers, it will escape out into the galaxy.
Jim Green: Now, it has radioisotope power and that will last for a considerable length of time past MU69. Do you think it can make it to the heliopause?
Alan Stern:  Well, that’s a good question. We have a lot of Kuiper Belt work left to do before we get to the heliopause.  The heliopause is probably 100 astronomical units out. And, if you--you know, if you calculate the amount of power that we have on board, we could still be operating then. It’ll be in the mid to late 2030s.
The thing about the heliopause, and I know you know this, Jim, is that it breathes in and out with the solar cycle, and sometimes it’s further and sometimes it’s closer. And, although we can predict exactly where New Horizons will be in any given year, no one knows how to predict those solar cycles. So, it’s hard to know, in the ‘30s if the heliopause will be farther and we run out of power before we get there, or if it’s closer and we’ve crossed it out into interstellar space.
That’s part of the excitement of that part of the mission that’ll come, you know, after the planetary science is more or less done, which will probably be in the 2020s. And, that will be a very valuable mission scientifically because the instrumentation on board in New Horizons is a generation more sophisticated than Voyager could carry. So, we can learn new things about that whole region of the solar system with these much more sensitive instruments.
Jim Green: Now, one of the things that New Horizons is doing between now and when it flies by MU69, is really looking at other Kuiper Belt objects. What do you hope to achieve by doing that?
Alan Stern: What we’re trying to--to put MU69 in context.  We’re going to swoop down on this one and study it with this spectacular battery of instruments and get all this detail, and the question is, how do the other ones look in comparison?  What are their shapes like? What are the number of satellites there like? What are their surface properties like, compared to MU69?
So, we’re actually looking at dozens of others with our telescope camera, called LORRI, on board, and not just before MU69. There are a lot of them to look at after MU69, because the Kuiper Belt doesn’t run out. It actually turns into what’s called the Extended Belt, or the Scattered Belt, that goes out actually hundreds of astronomical units. So, it’s all about context and making sure that we understand this valuable data set at MU69 compared to all the other things out there in the Kuiper Belt.
Jim Green: You know, this science is just spectacular.  We’re just pushing the limits of what we know about the solar system and making new discoveries every day. And, you know, I always ask what your gravity assist. What really got you excited about what we’re doing today?
Alan Stern: [Laughter] Well, I’ve had a number of gravity assists in my life, but I want to tell you about a very special one that occurred just a few weeks after the New Horizons flyby. I was in Vermont at a convention of amateur astronomers in August of 2015, and after my talk was over and most of the crowd had dissipated, there was someone there who said, “I’d just been waiting and waiting to just come up and tell you something.”
She said, “You know, people often say that our generation missed the boat on history, that we didn’t see a great world war--the great world war that triumphed over evil, and we didn’t have a chance to see the Moon landings or the birth of the computer revolution that we all live with now, and so many other things. And, we often hear the meme that we came too late for all those historic things.” And, she said, “I just want to tell you New Horizons is the best thing that’s ever happened in my lifetime.” And, wow, what a gravity assist for a scientist--
Jim Green:  --Yeah.--
Alan Stern:  --to hear something like that, when you’re a physicist and a planetary scientist who works on the research aspects and the technical aspects, and to hear that you could change people’s lives with the project that we did and that those of us on New Horizons could actually inspire someone that way, that was my gravity assist. And, it’s going to power me for the next 30 years to do more exploration.
Jim Green:  Fantastic. Well, Alan, it’s just been a joy having you here, talking about the Kuiper Belt and what’s next for New Horizons.
Alan Stern:  Thank you, Jim.
Jim Green:  Thank you very much. You know, it’s just been fantastic having you here, talking about the Kuiper Belt and what will New Horizons do next. I really appreciate it. Thanks so much for coming down.
Alan Stern: Thank you, Jim. Any time.
I’m Jim Green, and this is your Gravity Assist.
Follow NASA’s New Horizons mission at: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/newhorizons and http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/index.php and on Twitter: @NASANewHorizons and @NewHorizons2015
Love NASA science? Follow NASA’s Science Chief Thomas Zurbuchen on Twitter using @Dr_ThomasZ and check out #ScienceInSeconds for short videos.
And sure to listen to these NASA podcasts: “Houston: We Have a Podcast” from Johnson Space Center, Houston, and “NASA in Silicon Valley”from Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California.
Last Updated: Jan. 31, 2018
Editor: Gary Daines

Dance Preserves Oceans

$
0
0
Dance Preserves Oceans



An Orbital Dance 

May Help Preserve 

Oceans on Icy Worlds

Heat generated by the gravitational pull of moons formed from massive collisions could extend the lifetimes of liquid water oceans beneath the surface of large icy worlds in our outer solar system, according to new NASA research. This greatly expands the number of locations where extraterrestrial life might be found, since liquid water is necessary to support known forms of life and astronomers estimate there are dozens of these worlds.
Image of Pluto and Charon
Composite, enhanced-color image of Pluto (lower right) and its largest moon Charon (upper left) taken by NASA’s New Horizons spacecraft on July 14, 2015. Pluto and Charon are shown with approximately correct relative sizes, but their true separation is not to scale.
Credits: NASA/JHUAPL/SwRI
“These objects need to be considered as potential reservoirs of water and life,” said Prabal Saxena of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, lead author of the research published in Icarus November 24. “If our study is correct, we now may have more places in our solar system that possess some of the critical elements for extraterrestrial life.”
These frigid worlds are found beyond the orbit of Neptune and include Pluto and its moons. They are known as Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs) and are far too cold to have liquid water on their surfaces, where temperatures are less than 350 degrees below zero Fahrenheit (below minus 200 Celsius). However, there is evidence that some may have layers of liquid water beneath their icy crusts. In addition to bulk densities that are similar to other bodies suspected to have subsurface oceans, an analysis of the light reflected from some TNOs reveals signatures of crystalline water ice and ammonia hydrates. At the extremely low surface temperatures on these objects, water ice takes a disordered, amorphous form instead of the regularly ordered crystals typical in warmer areas, such as snowflakes on Earth. Also, space radiation converts crystalline water ice to the amorphous form and breaks down ammonia hydrates, so they are not expected to survive long on TNO surfaces. This suggests that both compounds may have come from an interior liquid water layer that erupted to the surface, a process known as cryovolcanism.
Image of possible cryovolcano on Pluto
Composite image of Wright Mons, one of two potential cryovolcanoes spotted on the surface of Pluto by the New Horizons spacecraft in July 2015.
Credits: NASA/JHUAPL/SwRI
Most of the long-lived heat inside TNOs comes from the decay of radioactive elements that were incorporated into these objects as they formed. This heat can be enough to melt a layer of the icy crust, generating a subsurface ocean and perhaps maintaining it for billions of years. But as the radioactive elements decay into more stable ones, they stop releasing heat and the interiors of these objects gradually cool, and any subsurface oceans will eventually freeze. However, the new research found that the gravitational interaction with a moon can generate enough additional heat inside a TNO to significantly extend the lifetime of a subsurface ocean.
The orbit of any moon will evolve in a gravitational “dance” with its parent object to achieve the most stable state possible – circular, aligned with the equator of its parent, and with the moon spinning at a rate where the same side always faces its parent. Large collisions between celestial objects can generate moons when material is splashed into orbit around the larger object and coalesces into one or more moons under its own gravity. Since collisions occur in a huge variety of directions and speeds, they are unlikely to produce moons with perfectly stable orbits initially. As a collision-generated moon adjusts to a more stable orbit, mutual gravitational attraction causes the interiors of the parent world and its new moon to repeatedly stretch and relax, generating friction that releases heat in a process known as tidal heating.
The team used the equations for tidal heating and calculated its contribution to the “heat budget” for a wide variety of discovered and hypothetical TNO-moon systems, including the Eris-Dysnomia system. Eris is second-largest of the currently known TNOs after Pluto.
“We found that tidal heating can be a tipping point that may have preserved oceans of liquid water beneath the surface of large TNOs like Pluto and Eris to the present day,” said Wade Henning of NASA Goddard and the University of Maryland, College Park, a co-author of the study.
“Crucially, our study also suggests that tidal heating could make deeply buried oceans more accessible to future observations by moving them closer to the surface,” said Joe Renaud of George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, a co-author on the paper. “If you have a liquid water layer, the additional heat from tidal heating would cause the next adjacent layer of ice to melt.”
Although liquid water is necessary for life, it is not enough by itself. Life also needs a supply of chemical building blocks and a source of energy. Deep under the ocean on Earth, certain geologically active places have entire ecosystems that thrive in total darkness because hydrothermal vents called “black smokers” supply the needed ingredients in the form of energy-rich chemicals dissolved in superheated water. Tidal heating or heat from the decay of radioactive elements could both create such hydrothermal vents, according to the team.
The team would like to develop and use even more accurate models of tidal heating and TNO interiors to determine how long tidal heating can extend the lifetime of a liquid water ocean and how the orbit of a moon evolves as tidal heating dissipates energy. The team would also like to discover at what point a liquid water ocean forms; whether it forms almost immediately or if it requires a significant buildup of heat first.
The research was funded by the NASA Postdoctoral Program, managed by the Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, Maryland, as well as the NASA Outer Planets Research Program grant NNX14AR42G. The research was conducted in collaboration with the Sellers Exoplanet Environments Collaboration at NASA Goddard.
Last Updated: Nov. 30, 2017
Editor: Bill Steigerwald

Comet’s First Passage Through Solar System Reveals Unexpected Secrets | NASA

$
0
0
Comet’s First Passage Through Solar System Reveals Unexpected Secrets | NASA



Observations of a Comet’s 

First Passage Through the 

Solar System Reveal 

Unexpected Secrets

Comets are our most direct link to the earliest stages of the formation and evolution of the solar system.  Only every few years is a new comet discovered that is making its first trip to the inner solar system from the Oort Cloud, a zone of icy objects enveloping the solar system.  Such opportunities offer astronomers a chance to study a special class of comets.
Onboard NASA’s flying telescope, the Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy, or SOFIA, a team lead by Charles Woodward of the University of Minnesota’s Minnesota Institute for Astrophysics observed Comet C/2012 K1 (also called Pan-STARRS after the observatory that discovered it in 2012), searching for new insights into the evolution of the early solar system.
Comets originating from the Oort Cloud, like Comet C/2012 K1, remain unaffected by the thermal heating and radiation processing of the Sun. The pristine nature of these comets can preserve surface materials making them ideal targets for observing gas and dust particle composition.
“Comet C/2012 K1 is a time capsule of the early solar system’s composition,” Woodward said. “Every opportunity to study these bodies contributes to our understanding of the general characteristics of comets and the formation of small bodies in in our solar system.”
The team used short and long wavelength cameras on the Faint Object infraRed CAmera for the SOFIA Telescope, FORCAST, to study light emitting from the comet’s coma: gas and dust that form around a comet’s nucleus as it is heated by the Sun.  The team used the observations to deduce the size and composition of the dust grains and to identify and categorize their thermal properties. 
Unexpectedly, these observations revealed weak silicate emission features from the comet, rather than the anticipated strong silicate features found in some prior Oort Cloud comet observations, including those of Comet Hale-Bopp and studies conducted with the Spitzer Space Telescope. By analyzing these silicate emissions and comparing them to thermal models, the researchers determined that the coma’s dust grains are large and comprised predominately of carbon rather than crystalline silicate. This composition challenges existing theoretical models of how Oort cloud comets form.
“Comets are made of materials similar to those of planets, so studying the dust in them can help us understand the content, origin, and evolution of the early solar system, including the process of forming rocky planets,” said Woodward.
While missions like the European Space Agency’s Rosetta mission, or NASA’s Stardust mission provided direct sampling of comet materials, remote observations, such as those conducted aboard SOFIA, provide researchers with an opportunity to understand similarities and differences between different types of comets.
Artist’s depiction of Comet C/2012 K1 (also called Pan-STARRS) and its coma during its first approach into the solar system.
Artist’s depiction of Comet C/2012 K1 (also called Pan-STARRS) and its coma during its first approach into the solar system.
Credits: NASA/SOFIA/ Lynette Cook
“The strength of Comet C/2012 K1’s silicate features observed in mid-infrared with SOFIA have set the stage for what we have proposed for observations using the forthcoming James Webb Space Telescope — to study even fainter more distant comets,” Woodward said. “I think there will be a nice synergy between those two missions, in target selection and targeted follow up.”
This study was published in the Astrophysical Journal.
SOFIA is a Boeing 747SP jetliner modified to carry a 100-inch diameter telescope. It is a joint project of NASA and the German Aerospace Center, DLR. NASA’s Ames Research Center in California’s Silicon Valley manages the SOFIA program, science and mission operations in cooperation with the Universities Space Research Association headquartered in Columbia, Maryland, and the German SOFIA Institute (DSI) at the University of Stuttgart. The aircraft is based at NASA’s Armstrong Flight Research Center's Hangar 703, in Palmdale, California.
Media Point of Contact
Nicholas A. Veronico
NVeronico@sofia.usra.edu • SOFIA Science Center, NASA Ames Research Center
Last Updated: Nov. 21, 2017
Editor: Kassandra Bell

Artificial Intelligence, NASA Data Used to Discover Exoplanet | NASA

$
0
0
Artificial Intelligence, NASA Data Used to Discover Exoplanet | NASA



Artificial Intelligence, 

NASA Data Used to 

Discover Eighth Planet 

Circling Distant Star

The Kepler-90 system is the first to tie with our solar system in number of planets.
With the discovery of an eighth planet, the Kepler-90 system is the first to tie with our solar system in number of planets.
Credits: NASA/Wendy Stenzel
Our solar system now is tied for most number of planets around a single star, with the recent discovery of an eighth planet circling Kepler-90, a Sun-like star 2,545 light-years from Earth. The planet was discovered in data from NASA’s Kepler Space Telescope.
The newly-discovered Kepler-90i – a sizzling hot, rocky planet that orbits its star once every 14.4 days – was found using machine learning from Google. Machine learning is an approach to artificial intelligence in which computers “learn.” In this case, computers learned to identify planets by finding in Kepler data instances where the telescope recorded signals from planets beyond our solar system, known as exoplanets. 
NASA will host a Reddit Ask Me Anything at 3 p.m. EST today on this discovery.
Our solar system now is tied for most number of planets around a single star, with the recent discovery of an eighth planet circling Kepler-90, a Sun-like star 2,545 light years from Earth. The planet was discovered in data from NASA’s Kepler Space Telescope.
Credits: NASA
“Just as we expected, there are exciting discoveries lurking in our archived Kepler data, waiting for the right tool or technology to unearth them,” said Paul Hertz, director of NASA’s Astrophysics Division in Washington. “This finding shows that our data will be a treasure trove available to innovative researchers for years to come.” 
The discovery came about after researchers Christopher Shallue and Andrew Vanderburg trained a computer to learn how to identify exoplanets in the light readings recorded by Kepler – the minuscule change in brightness captured when a planet passed in front of, or transited, a star. Inspired by the way neurons connect in the human brain, this artificial “neural network” sifted through Kepler data and found weak transit signals from a previously-missed eighth planet orbiting Kepler-90, in the constellation Draco.
While machine learning has previously been used in searches of the Kepler database, this research demonstrates that neural networks are a promising tool in finding some of the weakest signals of distant worlds.  
Other planetary systems probably hold more promise for life than Kepler-90. About 30 percent larger than Earth, Kepler-90i is so close to its star that its average surface temperature is believed to exceed 800 degrees Fahrenheit, on par with Mercury. Its outermost planet, Kepler-90h, orbits at a similar distance to its star as Earth does to the Sun.
“The Kepler-90 star system is like a mini version of our solar system. You have small planets inside and big planets outside, but everything is scrunched in much closer,” said Vanderburg, a NASA Sagan Postdoctoral Fellow and astronomer at the University of Texas at Austin.
Shallue, a senior software engineer with Google’s research team Google AI, came up with the idea to apply a neural network to Kepler data. He became interested in exoplanet discovery after learning that astronomy, like other branches of science, is rapidly being inundated with data as the technology for data collection from space advances.
“In my spare time, I started googling for ‘finding exoplanets with large data sets’ and found out about the Kepler mission and the huge data set available,” said Shallue. "Machine learning really shines in situations where there is so much data that humans can't search it for themselves.”
Kepler’s four-year dataset consists of 35,000 possible planetary signals. Automated tests, and sometimes human eyes, are used to verify the most promising signals in the data. However, the weakest signals often are missed using these methods. Shallue and Vanderburg thought there could be more interesting exoplanet discoveries faintly lurking in the data. 
First, they trained the neural network to identify transiting exoplanets using a set of 15,000 previously-vetted signals from the Kepler exoplanet catalogue. In the test set, the neural network correctly identified true planets and false positives 96 percent of the time. Then, with the neural network having "learned" to detect the pattern of a transiting exoplanet, the researchers directed their model to search for weaker signals in 670 star systems that already had multiple known planets. Their assumption was that multiple-planet systems would be the best places to look for more exoplanets.
“We got lots of false positives of planets, but also potentially more real planets,” said Vanderburg. “It’s like sifting through rocks to find jewels. If you have a finer sieve then you will catch more rocks but you might catch more jewels, as well.”
Kepler-90i wasn’t the only jewel this neural network sifted out. In the Kepler-80 system, they found a sixth planet. This one, the Earth-sized Kepler-80g, and four of its neighboring planets form what is called a resonant chain – where planets are locked by their mutual gravity in a rhythmic orbital dance. The result is an extremely stable system, similar to the seven planets in the TRAPPIST-1 system.
Their research paper reporting these findings has been accepted for publication in The Astronomical Journal. Shallue and Vanderburg plan to apply their neural network to Kepler’s full set of more than 150,000 stars.
Kepler has produced an unprecedented data set for exoplanet hunting. After gazing at one patch of space for four years, the spacecraft now is operating on an extended mission and switches its field of view every 80 days.
“These results demonstrate the enduring value of Kepler’s mission,” said Jessie Dotson, Kepler’s project scientist at NASA’s Ames Research Center in California’s Silicon Valley. “New ways of looking at the data – such as this early-stage research to apply machine learning algorithms – promises to continue to yield significant advances in our understanding of planetary systems around other stars. I’m sure there are more firsts in the data waiting for people to find them.”
Ames manages the Kepler and K2 missions for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate in Washington. NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, managed Kepler mission development. Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corporation operates the flight system with support from the Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics at the University of Colorado in Boulder. This work was performed through the Carl Sagan Postdoctoral Fellowship Program executed by the NASA Exoplanet Science Institute.
For more information on this announcement, visit:
For more information about the Kepler mission, visit:
-end-
Felicia Chou
Headquarters, Washington
202-358-0257
felicia.chou@nasa.gov
Alison Hawkes
Ames Research Center, California’s Silicon Valley
650-604-0281
alison.j.hawkesbak@nasa.gov 
Last Updated: Dec. 14, 2017
Editor: Karen Northon

Artificial Intelligence and NASA Data Used to Discover Eighth Planet Cir...

Flyover of Jupiter’s North Pole in Infrared

Abstract Jupiter Atmosphere | NASA

$
0
0
Abstract Jupiter Atmosphere | NASA



Abstract Jupiter Atmosphere

Jupiter
Citizen scientist Rick Lundh created this abstract Jovian artwork using data from the JunoCam imager on NASA’s Juno spacecraft.
The original image captures a close-up view of numerous storms in the northern hemisphere of Jupiter. To produce this artwork, Lundh selected a more contrasting part of one of Jupiter’s storms, then cropped the image and applied an oil-painting filter.
NASA’s Juno spacecraft took this image during its tenth close flyby of the gas giant planet on Dec. 16, 2017 at 9:43 a.m. PST (12:43 p.m. EST). At the time, the spacecraft was about 8,292 miles (13,344 kilometers) from the tops of the clouds above the planet, with the images centered at a latitude of 48.9 degrees.
JunoCam's raw images are available for the public to peruse and process into image products at:
More information about Juno is at:
Image credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SwRI/MSSS/Rick Lundh
Last Updated: March 28, 2018
Editor: Tony Greicius

Intricate Clouds of Jupiter | NASA

$
0
0
Intricate Clouds of Jupiter | NASA



Intricate Clouds of Jupiter

Jupiter
See intricate cloud patterns in the northern hemisphere of Jupiter in this new view taken by NASA’s Juno spacecraft.
The color-enhanced image was taken on April 1 at 2:32 a.m. PST (5:32 a.m. EST), as Juno performed its twelfth close flyby of Jupiter. At the time the image was taken, the spacecraft was about 7,659 miles (12,326 kilometers) from the tops of the clouds of the planet at a northern latitude of 50.2 degrees.
Citizen scientist Kevin M. Gill processed this image using data from the JunoCam imager.
JunoCam's raw images are available for the public to peruse and process into image products at:
More information about Juno is at:
Image credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SwRI/MSSS/Kevin M. Gill
Last Updated: April 6, 2018
Editor: Tony Greicius

Fresh Results from NASA’s Galileo Spacecraft 20 Years On | NASA

$
0
0
Fresh Results from NASA’s Galileo Spacecraft 20 Years On | NASA



Hubble image of Jupiter and its moon Ganymede

Old Data, New Tricks: 

Fresh Results from NASA’s 

Galileo Spacecraft 20 Years On

Galileo image of Ganymede
This image of Ganymede, one of Jupiter's moons and the largest moon in our solar system, was taken by NASA's Galileo spacecraft.
Credits: NASA
Far across the solar system, from where Earth appears merely as a pale blue dot, NASA’s Galileo spacecraft spent eight years orbiting Jupiter. During that time, the hearty spacecraft — slightly larger than a full-grown giraffe — sent back spates of discoveries on the gas giant’s moons, including the observation of a magnetic environment around Ganymede that was distinct from Jupiter’s own magnetic field. The mission ended in 2003, but newly resurrected data from Galileo’s first flyby of Ganymede is yielding new insights about the moon’s environment — which is unlike any other in the solar system.
“We are now coming back over 20 years later to take a new look at some of the data that was never published and finish the story,” said Glyn Collinson, lead author of a recent paper about Ganymede's magnetosphere at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. “We found there’s a whole piece no one knew about.”
The new results showed a stormy scene: particles blasted off the moon’s icy surface as a result of incoming plasma rain, and strong flows of plasma pushed between Jupiter and Ganymede due to an explosive magnetic event occurring between the two bodies’ magnetic environments. Scientists think these observations could be key to unlocking the secrets of the moon, such as why Ganymede’s auroras are so bright.
In 1996, shortly after arriving at Jupiter, Galileo made a surprising discovery: Ganymede had its own magnetic field. While most planets in our solar system, including Earth, have magnetic environments — known as magnetospheres — no one expected a moon to have one. 
Between 1996 and 2000, Galileo made six targeted flybys of Ganymede, with multiple instruments collecting data on the moon’s magnetosphere. These included the spacecraft's Plasma Subsystem, or PLS, which measured the density, temperature and direction of the plasma — excited, electrically charged gas — flowing through the environment around Galileo. New results, recently published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, reveal interesting details about the magnetosphere's unique structure.
We know that Earth’s magnetosphere — in addition to helping make compasses work and causing auroras — is key to in sustaining life on our planet, because it helps protect our planet from radiation coming from space. Some scientists think Earth’s magnetosphere was also essential for the initial development of life, as this harmful radiation can erode our atmosphere. Studying magnetospheres throughout the solar system not only helps scientists learn about the physical processes affecting this magnetic environment around Earth, it helps us understand the atmospheres around other potentially habitable worlds, both in our own solar system and beyond.
infographic describing Ganymede's magnetosphere
This infographic describes Ganymede's magnetosphere.
Credits: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center/Mary Pat Hrybyk-Keith
Ganymede’s magnetosphere offers the chance to explore a unique magnetic environment located within the much larger magnetosphere of Jupiter. Nestled there, it’s protected from the solar wind, making its shape different from other magnetospheres in the solar system. Typically, magnetospheres are shaped by the pressure of supersonic solar wind particles flowing past them. But at Ganymede, the relatively slower-moving plasma around Jupiter sculpts the moon's magnetosphere into a long horn-like shape that stretches ahead of the moon in the direction of its orbit.
Flying past Ganymede, Galileo was continually pummeled by high-energy particles — a battering the moon is also familiar with. Plasma particles accelerated by the Jovian magnetosphere, continually rain down on Ganymede’s poles, where the magnetic field channels them toward the surface. The new analysis of Galileo PLS data showed plasma being blasted off the moon’s icy surface due to the incoming plasma rain.
“There are these particles flying out from the polar regions, and they can tell us something about Ganymede’s atmosphere, which is very thin,” said Bill Paterson, a co-author of the study at NASA Goddard, who served on the Galileo PLS team during the mission. “It can also tell us about how Ganymede’s auroras form.”
This visualization shows a simplified model of Jupiter’s magnetosphere, designed to illustrate the scale, and basic features of the structure and impacts of the magnetic axis (cyan arrow) offset from the planetary rotation axis (blue arrow). The semi-transparent gray mesh in the distance represents the boundary of the magnetosphere.
Credits: NASA's Scientific Visualization Studio/JPL NAIF
Jupiter and Ganymede
In this illustration, the moon Ganymede orbits the giant planet Jupiter. Ganymede is depicted with auroras, which were observed by NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope.
Credits: NASA/ESA
Ganymede has auroras, or northern and southern lights, just like Earth does. However, unlike our planet, the particles causing Ganymede’s auroras come from the plasma surrounding Jupiter, not the solar wind. When analyzing the data, the scientists noticed that during its first Ganymede flyby, Galileo fortuitously crossed right over Ganymede’s auroral regions, as evidenced by the ions it observed raining down onto the surface of the moon’s polar cap. By comparing the location where the falling ions were observed with data from Hubble, the scientists were able to pin down the precise location of the auroral zone, which will help them solve mysteries, such as what causes the auroras. 
As it cruised around Jupiter, Galileo also happened to fly right through an explosive event caused by the tangling and snapping of magnetic field lines. This event, called magnetic reconnection, occurs in magnetospheres across our solar system. For the first time, Galileo observed strong flows of plasma pushed between Jupiter and Ganymede due to a magnetic reconnection event occurring between the two magnetospheres. It’s thought that this plasma pump is responsible for making Ganymede’s auroras unusually bright.
Future study of the PLS data from that encounter may yet provide new insights related to subsurface oceans previously determined to exist within the moon using data from both Galileo and the Hubble Space Telescope.
The research was funded by NASA’s Solar System Workings program and the Galileo mission managed by NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, for the agency’s Science Mission Directorate in Washington.
Related Links
Banner image: NASA's Hubble Space Telescope has caught Jupiter's moon Ganymede playing a game of "peek-a-boo." In this crisp Hubble image, Ganymede is shown just before it ducks behind the giant planet. This color image was made from three images taken on April 9, 2007, with the Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 in red, green, and blue filters. The image shows Jupiter and Ganymede in close to natural colors. Credit: NASA, ESA and E. Karkoschka (University of Arizona)
Last Updated: April 30, 2018
Editor: Rob Garner

el dispensador de las energías cósmicas (cuerdas y huecos) - by Cerasale Morteo, Víctor Norberto | Salta | ARGENTINA - 22 de MAYO de 2018 [06] DIEZ AÑOS ABRIENDO LOS OJOS DEL ALMA... la consciencia nos distingue y el aura nos define, ambas son invisibles a los sentidos humanos, pero perfectamente visibles a los ojos del alma y a los seres que "ven a través de su propia luz"... los cinismos pesan tanto como las palabras y las segundas intenciones...

$
0
0
el dispensador de las energías cósmicas (cuerdas y huecos) - by Cerasale Morteo, Víctor Norberto | Salta | ARGENTINA -  22 de MAYO de 2018 [06] DIEZ AÑOS ABRIENDO LOS OJOS DEL ALMA... la consciencia nos distingue y el aura nos define, ambas son invisibles a los sentidos humanos, pero perfectamente visibles a los ojos del alma y a los seres que "ven a través de su propia luz"... los cinismos pesan tanto como las palabras y las segundas intenciones...
La imagen puede contener: exterior y naturaleza
La imagen puede contener: exterior y naturaleza
el dispensador dice: en el Stupa del Itey los molinos de oración giran en contra de las agujas del reloj... no se impulsan por las manos sino por las ideas que flotan en el recinto... cuando entras están girando, cuando te vas siguen girando... no se detienen nunca por motivo alguno... y mientras giran pueden verse esferas girando en su mismo sentido y esferas girando en el sentido contrario, apenas invadiéndose los espacios, lo suficiente como para producir una extraña música que es conocida como la "música de la rueda de la vida", que en realidad también es la "música de la rueda de la muerte"... el sonido envuelve y embeleza, a tal punto que uno pierde consciencia de estancia y de permanencia... no está vivo, tampoco está muerto... traduce un limbo dimensional que puede percibirse mediante la sensibilidad de espíritu... ya que no debe omitirse que el Stupa del Itey, aún estando en el Tíbet, no lo está en esta dimensión sino en la contigua, a dos de la de los tiempos respirables... Tíbet adentro... Tíbet desconocido para los humanos... cuando suena la música de la vida, las esferas siembran las almas que van a nacer... que son antes de su momento... que están pendientes en el más allá que aguarda convertirse en gracia... cuando suena la música de la muerte, las esferas recogen a las almas en su punto de desprendimiento... el preciso instante en que el espíritu abandona el cuerpo para regresar a su estado de vapor... el destino regreso al libro de la vida dándose por consumado... la consciencia regresa al árbol de la vida, para ser savia potencial del siguiente ciclo...
los molinillos de oración giran por la idea necesaria que mantiene el orden supremo que a su vez, sostiene la vigencia de los ciclos a pesar de las miserias humanas y las mezquindades consecuentes con dichas miserias... la vida es a pesar de... y los destinos se cumplen según lo escrito y lo pensado... porque en ellos viaja el motivo...
hay un motivo para descender...
hay un motivo para ascender...
cuando algo se altera, no respondiendo a lo escrito o lo sembrado, se produce una paradoja cósmica que deberá aguardar, pendiente, hasta ser reparada (corregida)... a veces una paradoja da lugar a otras sucesivas y consecuentes... provocándose un desorden cósmico que afecta la secuencia de las gracias (que contienen al menos un don y un talento)... entonces los ángeles deben trabajar en la recuperación de los huecos y sus cuerdas... para que todo regrese al orden original...
el ser humano se asume "ordenador" cuando en verdad ni siquiera participa... se cree "tutor" cuando en verdad ni siquiera reconoce la función... luego, se considera "propietario" sin caer en la cuenta de su condición finita, y de tanto efímera... a tal punto que se va creyendo haber participado de algo que jamás conoció... 
la forma no es más que una idea... 
el color no es más que una idea...
y la vida que se transita concedida, no es nada si no se porta la idea imbuida de consciencia... que habilita a que el molinillo gire, sin necesidad de impulsarlo. MAYO 22, 2018.-
La imagen puede contener: exterior y naturaleza
Carmen Conde Sedemiuqse Esquimedes

Archivo del blog




el dispensador de las energías cósmicas (cuerdas y huecos) - by Cerasale Morteo, Víctor Norberto | Salta | ARGENTINA -  18 de MAYO de 2018 [05] DIEZ AÑOS ABRIENDO LOS OJOS DEL ALMA... la consciencia nos distingue y el aura nos define, ambas son invisibles a los sentidos humanos, pero perfectamente visibles a los ojos del alma y a los seres que "ven a través de su propia luz"... los cinismos pesan tanto como las palabras y las segundas intenciones...
La imagen puede contener: nube, cielo, planta, árbol, exterior y naturaleza
La imagen puede contener: nube, cielo, planta, árbol, exterior y naturaleza
el dispensador dice: es necesario envolver el planeta (TIERRA) en la idea original... la que sustenta el sentido de la vida... la que sostiene el sentido de las fuentes... la que guarda el sentido de los ciclos que mueven y son motivo de la rueda de la vida... la Tierra puede girar sobre sí misma y recorrer su órbita alrededor del Sol haciéndole creer a las gentes que están en movimiento, pero en verdad... en realidad... cuando se detiene el alma, se paraliza el espíritu y se oxida la consciencia... el ser se inmoviliza y cree que vive, cuando en verdad está detenido en el sí mismo que se extiende desde la eternidad hacia la eternidad... no hay elipse... no hay trayecto... no hay trazo... no hay órbita... sólo se produce un recitado que desborda palabras pero sin establecer hechos... donde no los hay (hechos), no hay vida y el karma permanece reducido al "sí mismo" inerte...
es imprescindible envolver el planeta (TIERRA) en la versión fundamental que trajo la humanidad a residir en este suelo, con este aire, con este agua, con este fuego... por un lapso efímero... donde nada te pertenece y sólo perteneces... donde la gracia se te concede para que extiendas tu ser hacia el prójimo ofrecido por y desde las circunstancias... sólo el valor construye sobre el valor... sólo la vida siembra sobre la vida... no se ve desde los ojos, el valor sólo se aprecia desde los ojos del alma... la realidad no reside en lo que percibes mediante tus sentidos, la realidad es un "algo" que te está atravesando mientras respiras... eres tú girando en tu propio karma... la realidad que crees que está por fuera de tu personas, no existe... es un estado ilusorio de vida trascendente cuando en verdad, sólo estás transitando tu propia impermanencia...
no puedes ir más lento que tu ciclo...
no puedes ir más rápido que tu ciclo...
todo sucede según lo que está escrito en tu karma desde y hacia la eternidad que te contiene y a la que perteneces... 
lo comparto contigo porque todavía es tiempo... 
no hay valor en las palabras sin valor, echadas a los cuatro vientos... lo que da sentido a las palabras son los hechos sin precio... donde hay precio no hay sentido ni valor alguno... es simple de entender, hasta que el entendimiento se choca contra la mezquindad y la miseria humanas... que te hace suponer que eres más que tu prójimo... alimentando la soberbia que se escuda en los cinismos necesarios al desprecio... 
es rara esta humanidad carente de humanismos...
tiene planeta (suelo, aire, agua, fuego) pero lo niega y lo desprecia... sin darse cuenta que no hay otro (planeta) al alcance de la mano... desconociendo aún cúal es el proceso necesario para transplantar el ciclo de los espíritus a otro astro distante... no sabe cómo se recrea la vida a partir de la nada... no sabe cómo viaja la vida a través de la nada... no sabe de qué se trata la impermanencia espontánea... no sabe cómo se siembran las fuentes... no sabe cómo se sostiene la idea original y primigenia... no sabe porque no quiere saber... porque no merece saberlo... justamente, quien reniega de la idea de sí mismo, termina negando la idea de cual proviene como "motivo"... y dicha paradoja adquiere magnitud de tsunami, arrasando los sentidos de la vida (de todos). MAYO 18, 2018.-
La imagen puede contener: nube, cielo, planta, árbol, exterior y naturaleza
Carmen Conde Sedemiuqse Esquimedes

Archivo del blog


el dispensador de las energías cósmicas (cuerdas y huecos) - by Cerasale Morteo, Víctor Norberto | Salta | ARGENTINA -  14 de MAYO de 2018 [04] DIEZ AÑOS ABRIENDO LOS OJOS DEL ALMA... la consciencia nos distingue y el aura nos define, ambas son invisibles a los sentidos humanos, pero perfectamente visibles a los ojos del alma y a los seres que "ven a través de su propia luz"... los cinismos pesan tanto como las palabras y las segundas intenciones...
La imagen puede contener: noche, cielo, exterior y agua
La imagen puede contener: noche, cielo, exterior y agua
el dispensador dice: preferí guardarme en los reflejos... mirando el horizonte entendí el sentido de saberme añejo, del paso lento, del observar en silencio... supe que la isla sólo aparece después del naufragio, que antes es idea y que el rumbo no se elige, sino que alguien dirige la sensación mucho antes que el pensamiento sea razón... comprendí que cada destino es único, y que aún cuando se parezcan, se distinguen por el alma de quien los porta... que el karma se vive pero no se anota... que el karma se respira, pero que si sé es humano, no se recuerda... que siempre hay un hueco por cada cuerda... y que todo se mueve mientras se recita la idea de la cual se proviene... ¿cómo decirlo?... vengo de un mundo de varios soles, con muchos satélites y un cielo majestuoso... vengo de un mundo donde nadie se come al otro, donde no se compite y donde la sociedad se recrea en la filosofía que nadie omite...
la Tierra gira alrededor de su SOL, pero las gentes se han quedado sin horizontes, porque alguien les ha sacrificado el futuro burlándose de su dignidad y humillándole su esperanza... la humanidad ha perdido su risa, y ya no comprende que reír es parte fundamental para conceder valor a la vida... no reírse del prójimo sino de sí mismo... de esas deficiencias que inducen a tomar consciencia que se puede mejorar asumiendo el error como parte del proceso de las sapiencias... la Tierra gira, sí, pero la humanidad está inmóvil mientras la civilización retrograda creyendo que el conflicto enriquece... mientras la paradoja que sacrifica los destinos, crece, se disemina, se instala, y los ancestros contemplan impotentes...
el hombre no entiende que la música que hoy suena, una vez que toma entidad de sonido se expande hacia la eternidad, repitiéndose una y otra vez en todas las geometrías del universo posible...
el hombre no entiende que el cuenco que porta agua, perdura en la sed y en la saciedad de su tiempo...
el hombre no entiende que la fina porcelana que se quiebra... no se recupera en ningún presente...
todo es sencillo, excepto cuando el espíritu necesita de la madeja para poner a salvo sus propias mezquindades... 
cuando la palabra no se honra, lo que se deshonra es la vida... 
como te he dicho, la isla sólo aparece ante el destino elegido luego de su naufragio... porque es allí cuando adquiere entidad de salvación... la isla no estaba allí hasta que la idea lo hizo necesario... la isla no estaba allí hasta que el motivo le dio entidad de bendición... 
la respuesta de un destino no es la respuesta del destino del otro... no puede serlo porque los karmas provienen de distintas esencias... y aún creyendo mirar el mismo SOL, éste será distinto... entonces, ¿cuál es tu estrella?, seguramente no la que veo con mis ojos... seguramente no la que veo con mi alma... por eso cada camino es único, y debe ser honrado como gracia universal. MAYO 14, 2018.-
La imagen puede contener: noche, cielo, exterior y agua
Carmen Conde Sedemiuqse Esquimedes


Archivo del blog


el dispensador de las energías cósmicas (cuerdas y huecos) - by Cerasale Morteo, Víctor Norberto | Salta | ARGENTINA -  10 de MAYO de 2018 [03] DIEZ AÑOS ABRIENDO LOS OJOS DEL ALMA... la consciencia nos distingue y el aura nos define, ambas son invisibles a los sentidos humanos, pero perfectamente visibles a los ojos del alma y a los seres que "ven a través de su propia luz"... los cinismos pesan tanto como las palabras y las segundas intenciones...
La imagen puede contener: cielo, planta, exterior y naturaleza
La imagen puede contener: cielo, planta, exterior y naturaleza
el dispensador dice: debería haber sido... no fue... no se pudo... hubo interferencia cósmica y la sonrisa se diluyó aguardando el "kalpa" propicio a las lágrimas presentes, que a veces quedan ausentes, que otras veces laten, quizás subyacen, se proyectan hacia los suelos para impregnar recuerdos que aún no se producen, que no son tales porque las personas que participan no lo saben... 
sintonizo con las gentes que sonríen porque sí... con las gentes que se arremangan para darte una mano sin pedirte nada a cambio, esperando sólo que hagas lo mismo cuando se produzca la oportunidad... es simple y de tanto, sencillo... he sido feliz al saberme lleno de mí mismo y vacío de los huecos ajenos... no, no te equivoques, no soy cristiano de curas ni de iglesias... soy cristiano de Dios y sólo de él... no creo en la palabra de los hombres... creo en los hechos... sólo en ellos... porque los hechos definen a las personas, el valor de sus dones y la honra de sus talentos... cuando la moneda supera o elude a la estima propia o del prójimo, no hay nada de qué hablar... la dignidad no se negocia, la esencia tampoco, ni qué hablar de la consciencia... parece fácil, no lo es... hay una brutal disociación entre la palabra y el hecho... así como la hay entre consciencia y dignidad... acaso, ¿has visto el bosque?... ¿has elegido el árbol que te eligió?... ah!, entonces sigues sin entender... no eliges, te eligen... no participas, te convidan... no vives, la vida que contiene tu destino es la que te vive... 
es necesario girar... debes moverte... debes rodar al igual que los molinillos de oración tibetanos... giran como gira el universo... porque en él (universo) todo sigue un prolijo orden que está por fuera de la mente humana... el budismo tiene una concepción inconcebible del tiempo cósmico, ése que transitas mientras transito el propio... la memoria cósmica budista dice que la leche materna que has mamado y las lágrimas que has derramado en la sucesión de vidas tienen mayor volumen que las aguas del mayor de los océanos... dicho espacio define tu trayectoria cósmica en el espacio visible y también en los intangibles...
cuatro "eones" es un "kalpa"... o bien, un "kalpa" equivale a cuatro "eones"... 
el universo no involuciona, es el ser humano el que lo hace... lo demás permanece en orden... y el orden se traduce en movimiento y motivo... siendo que el motivo es la fuente de la idea... siendo que la idea necesita de un motivo para ser tal... lo cual indica el movimiento que empuja a la energía pendiente... que no es otra cosa que el yo imbuido de consciencia describiendo una trayectoria inherente a un espacio... al que perteneces... donde nada te pertenece, por fuera del tiempo que se te concede como gracia...
ah!, sí, soy feliz con lo puesto... no porto ni derrotas ni éxitos... la historia que he escrito sólo contiene hechos que traducen pensamientos consecuentes con mi propia idea original... las derrotas y los éxitos no existen, sólo se trata de circunstancias que te ponen a prueba para medir si entiendes o no... los movimientos de los cuales participas por aquel orden cósmico previsto en el papiro de tu gracia... 
¿sabes?, he aprendido a girar sobre mi mismo asumiendo que además de hacerlo, giro con la Tierra que habito, orbitando alrededor del SOL y en conjunto haciéndolo con la galaxia respecto de un centro desconocido, pero con entidad pulsable desde la eternidad de la que provengo y hacia la cual me dirijo... mi sangre tiene mareas al igual que los océanos y del mismo modo que te pasa a ti y cualquiera de los demás... las mareas dependen de la Luna pero también de los otros astros que traccionan sobre nuestros espíritus, ya que somos parte de una fuerza suprema que nos contiene, habilitándonos a describir una trayectoria única... 
estoy feliz... te necesito porque sé que me necesitas... y formamos parte del mismo contexto atómico hasta que las circunstancias nos imponen sus distancias... sus cercanías... sus confluencias o sus divergencias... mientras hacemos culto de una misma "idea", somos "idea en comunión", y eso no es un tema menor, por el contrario, nos hermana... eso es lo que nos llevamos... la comunión de ser, honrando ése compartimento que nos fue concedido... me une a tí el anhelo del hacer el bien... y para pasar este cielo, sólo he necesitado hacer el bien a los prójimos que debieron cruzarse con mi trayectoria, así como yo con la de ellos... ¿qué más?... soy feliz de saberte cerca. MAYO 10 (11), 2018.-
La imagen puede contener: cielo, planta, exterior y naturaleza
Carmen Conde Sedemiuqse Esquimedes

Archivo del blog


el dispensador de las energías cósmicas (cuerdas y huecos) - by Cerasale Morteo, Víctor Norberto | Salta | ARGENTINA -  07 de MAYO de 2018 [02] DIEZ AÑOS ABRIENDO LOS OJOS DEL ALMA... la consciencia nos distingue y el aura nos define, ambas son invisibles a los sentidos humanos, pero perfectamente visibles a los ojos del alma y a los seres que "ven a través de su propia luz"... los cinismos pesan tanto como las palabras y las segundas intenciones...
No hay texto alternativo automático disponible.
No hay texto alternativo automático disponible.
el dispensador dice: lo que fluye no debe ser impedido... lo que fluye no debe ser evitado... lo que fluye no debe ser desviado... porque de ser impedido, acumulará mayor energía destructiva... de ser evitado, modificará su curso y su acción derivará en caos... porque de ser desviado, girará sobre sí mismo para regresar con mayor poder en lo deformado...
lo que fluye sucede a partir de su "acaso"... el motivo pone a prueba la idea expuesta a los racimos del viñedo expuesto a la estrella de su ocaso... el Sol acumulado será azúcar cuando la convergencia traduzca la esencia de aquellos que han superado el falso sentido de los fracasos... la reacción demanda estar alerta ante el horizonte que enseña su árbol... si él está allí, si lo estás mirando, te está esperando por algún motivo donde la salvación pendiente te está aguardando... para qué demorar lo que debe ocurrir en su momento dado?...
es necesario tomar consciencia de la posición de la "idea propia" ante la exposición a lo que fluye y te comprende... si la consciencia flota, la mente también lo hace... si la consciencia niega, la mente reniega del curso de la fluencia, oponiéndose a lo inevitable que toma volumen y magnitud arrasando con el empecinamiento que pretende evitar entender el por qué de la circunstancia... la corriente empuja y la impermanencia se consume en un esfuerzo inútil... lo que llega estaba escrito... nada puede evitarlo... si la consciencia lo acepta, flota... si la paciencia se revela, descubre... si la mente se acondiciona, entiende... si la conjunción se produce habilitando la convergencia, lo que siga agregará valor a la sapiencia, también a la prudencia...
se hace necesario comprender que la "fluencia" en  el curso temporal de una vida, depende del "pali mettà"... una geometría espiritual desconocida en el occidente denso... una geometría espiritual olvidada en el oriente utilitario... una geometría espiritual vigente en el reino de Shambala... "pali mettà" es aquello que deseas para los prójimos... es aquello que vuelve con fuerza de remolino o se transforma en torbellino... que eleva o ahoga... que flota y se sostiene o se sumerge y despoja... si el próximo carece de bienestar interior, la idea emergente puede hundirlo o hacerlo naufragar... si el próximo carece de paz interior y/o no reconoce la importancia de la felicidad a partir de la nada misma, la idea emergente es un rechazo a la marea de la realidad propuesta desde el libro de la vida... el "mettà" representa a la conjunción de la compasión, la solidaridad, la misericordia genuinas que se conjugan en un altruismo sustento del verdadero amor... en el "mettà" no hay interés ni tampoco conveniencia... sólo se representa por la aceptación y la fluencia... el "mettà" traduce y expresa lo mejor de uno mismo en continuidad... sin ésta (continuidad), la segunda intención devora el sentido del fluir de las corrientes, y al buscar una utilidad, se alteran todos los efectos eventuales posibles, determinando la presencia de alteraciones que pueden ser dañinas o catastróficas, según lo que se haya escondido en la segunda intención...
el "pali mettà" define al espíritu abierto hacia la propuesta del presente incierto... si dejas que suceda, la corriente te lleva hacia donde debes ir... si impides que suceda, la corriente se transformará en remolino y te hará conocer los vaivenes de las profundidades... 
el mundo actual está amenazado por espíritus que condicionan a los otros, sus prójimos conocidos, así como sus prójimos no conocidos, generando torbellinos que destruyen suelos, aires, aguas, fuegos y desde luego, espíritus, almas y consciencias, no sólo humanas... el pensamiento utilitario produce un efecto indeseable que convierte todo lo que toca en descartable, desechable, inutilizable... el "mettà" en sí mismo no abre la mente, sino que expande el sentido de la consciencia, produciendo una comunión con el alma y el espíritu en conjunción hacia los terceros... siendo que el "mettà" reside la paz anhelada a partir de la propia idea... dando lugar a que el motivo coincida con el hecho y derive en la felicidad comprensiva adherida a un curso temporal...
la cultura del "pali mettà" es universal y pertenece a los ámbitos de la eternidad... no es de patrimonio humano... pero reside en la esencia de quien la quiera hacer brotar. MAYO 07, 2018.-
No hay texto alternativo automático disponible.
Carmen Conde Sedemiuqse Esquimedes

Archivo del blog




el dispensador de las energías cósmicas (cuerdas y huecos) - by Cerasale Morteo, Víctor Norberto | Salta | ARGENTINA -  04 de MAYO de 2018 [01] DIEZ AÑOS ABRIENDO LOS OJOS DEL ALMA... la consciencia nos distingue y el aura nos define, ambas son invisibles a los sentidos humanos, pero perfectamente visibles a los ojos del alma y a los seres que "ven a través de su propia luz"... los cinismos pesan tanto como las palabras y las segundas intenciones...
La imagen puede contener: cielo, árbol, exterior y naturaleza
La imagen puede contener: cielo, árbol, exterior y naturaleza
el dispensador dice: ah! sí... en los universos visibles todo está en movimiento, desde lo minúsculo de un átomo hasta lo mayúsculo galáctico... todo se mueve, siempre... de manera ordenada, aún cuando parezca errático... las órbitas y las oscilaciones determinan un orden que excede cualquier razón y cualquier pensamiento... el orden es matemático y su progresión se produce bajo el signo del "motivo"... todo ello sucede sin participación humana alguna... más aún, todo ello ocurre sin consciencia humana alguna... léase, mientras todo tiene lugar, el humano está ajeno al todo...
¿cuándo comenzó?...
alguna vez, o quizás se mueve desde siempre... 
¿cuándo concluye?...
mientras hay movimiento no puede concluir... tal vez haya una fusión... tal vez haya más de una fusión, pero la consigna es el movimiento que traduce el motivo subyacente... algo semejante a un sistema de relojería inmaculado donde los engranajes no cesan de moverse porque conservan el sentido del presente en sucesión... 
¿ayer?...
se movía...
¿hoy?...
se mueve...
¿mañana?...
en el espacio no hay mañana, así como tampoco hay arriba ni abajo... no hay este ni oeste... nada amanece, nada se oculta, simplemente es una sucesión orbital contínua que conserva el sentido supremo de sus contenidos... para que algo exista, debe moverse... cuando deja de hacerlo, sencillamente no existe...
por eso naces de una gracia, portando un don y un talento... el don es el motivo... el talento traduce el movimiento...
respirar es algo semejante a una órbita... fluye...
pintar es una latencia perfecta que revela que el alma está vibrando en su lapso...
escribir es una vibración sostenida que traduce la necesidad espiritual de expresar la consciencia al modo de una traslación... hay un centro invisible... la vida recorre una trayectoria elíptica intangible... definida... matemáticamente diseñada...
sin número no habría movimiento... pero el número hace al movimiento y fíjate que todos los universos, visibles y no visibles, son impares... 
el cincel obliga al movimiento y lo que emerge estaba impreso en potencial, se trate de madera, roca o mármol... 
la música es un vaivén que no cesa... se desarrolla desde el número, en silencio, pero suena y se universaliza indefectible... y una vez que el acorde se enlaza queda flotando en el espacio cósmico para siempre... tú puedes no oírlo... pero el sonido viaja hacia la eternidad necesaria, ésa que carece de mañanas, porque en ella no hay nada pendiente...
ten en cuenta que el arte es movimiento...
considera que la vida sucumbe cuando el espíritu se entrega a la comodidad y al bienestar de la parálisis en regocijo... cree moverse pero está momificado... junta dineros que carecen de valor, impregnándose de vanidades y cinismos... esto es, que el espíritu se vacía y se oxida hasta morir en vida... negocia por el oxígeno que nadie respirará... compra y vende voluntades ajenas... pero se denigra a sí mismo porque abandona el espacio que se le había concedido para "ser" dentro de un "estar"... ése espíritu se queda sin número... y al hacerlo se queda sin órbita... flota pero no rota, tampoco gira... no sigue trazo ni trayectoria y sólo se llena con soberbia...
ah!, sí... en las dimensiones paralelas también todo está en movimiento... porque lo pendiente aguarda para resolverse... y la resolución depende del espacio próximo que responde a una fórmula universal... la del sentido supremo... 
todo se mueve desde siempre... 
todo se dirige hacia la eternidad... que te incluye... porque allí reside la idea de la cual provienes. MAYO 04, 2018.-
La imagen puede contener: cielo, árbol, exterior y naturaleza
Carmen Conde Sedemiuqse Esquimedes



Archivo del blog



NUESTRA SEÑORA DE LA MEDALLA MILAGROSA

NUESTRA SEÑORA DE LA MEDALLA MILAGROSA
Gracias por las tuyas concedidas

Dramatic Dione | NASA

$
0
0
Dramatic Dione | NASA



Dramatic Dione

Dione
Cassini captured this striking view of Saturn’s moon Dione on July 23, 2012. Dione is about 698 miles (1,123 kilometers) across. Its density suggests that about a third of the moon is made up of a dense core (probably silicate rock) with the remainder of its material being water ice. At Dione's average temperature of -304 degrees Fahrenheit (-186 degrees Celsius), ice is so hard it behaves like rock.
The image was taken with Cassini’s narrow-angle camera at a distance of approximately 260,000 miles (418,000 kilometers) from Dione, through a polarized filter and a spectral filter sensitive to green light.
The Cassini spacecraft ended its mission on Sept. 15, 2017.
The Cassini mission is a cooperative project of NASA, ESA (the European Space Agency) and the Italian Space Agency. The Jet Propulsion Laboratory, a division of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, manages the mission for NASA's Science Mission Directorate, Washington. The Cassini orbiter and its two onboard cameras were designed, developed and assembled at JPL. The imaging operations center is based at the Space Science Institute in Boulder, Colorado.
For more information about the Cassini-Huygens mission visit https://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov and https://www.nasa.gov/cassini. The Cassini imaging team homepage is at http://ciclops.org.
Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science Institute
Last Updated: March 12, 2018
Editor: Tony Greicius

Dione on the Edge | NASA

$
0
0
Dione on the Edge | NASA



Dione on the Edge

Saturn's moon Dione
Saturn’s moon Dione drifts before the planet’s rings, seen here almost edge on. For all their immense width, the rings are relatively paper-thin, about 30 feet (10 meters) in most places. For its part, Dione is about 698 miles (1,123 kilometers) across.
This natural-color view was obtained on Aug. 17, 2015 with Cassini’s wide-angle camera at a distance of approximately 66,200 miles (106,500 kilometers) from Dione.
The Cassini spacecraft ended its mission on Sept. 15, 2017.
The Cassini mission is a cooperative project of NASA, ESA (the European Space Agency) and the Italian Space Agency. The Jet Propulsion Laboratory, a division of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, manages the mission for NASA's Science Mission Directorate, Washington. The Cassini orbiter and its two onboard cameras were designed, developed and assembled at JPL. The imaging operations center is based at the Space Science Institute in Boulder, Colorado.
For more information about the Cassini-Huygens mission visit https://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov and https://www.nasa.gov/cassini. The Cassini imaging team homepage is at http://ciclops.org.
Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Space Science Institute
Last Updated: April 9, 2018
Editor: Tony Greicius
Viewing all 65649 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>